Guidelines on strategies for the universal implementation of videolaryngoscopy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10503209" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10503209 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KGIECmLyOF" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KGIECmLyOF</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002210" target="_blank" >10.1097/EJA.0000000000002210</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Guidelines on strategies for the universal implementation of videolaryngoscopy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
OBJECTIVE: The Airway Section of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Latin American Federation of Emergency Medicine (FLAME) and an international group of airway experts (IAG) aimed to establish multidisciplinary recommendations advocating for the universal use of videolaryngoscopy (VL) in both emergency and planned care settings. DESIGN: A committee of experts from the two national scientific societies and an international group of airway experts was convened. Relevant research questions aligning with the document's objective were identified. A rapid systematic review of the evidence was performed, and the quality of evidence was assessed. Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) The entire process was conducted independently of industry funding. METHODS: Six domains were defined pertaining to VL: Clinical Benefits; Infrastructure and Accessibility; Clinical Guidelines and Protocols; Teaching and Clinical Training; Dissemination and Promotion of Clinical Benefits; Innovation, Sustainability, and Research. For each domain, specific questions were developed using the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes). A literature search was conducted following PRISMA-R guidelines and analysed using the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: The synthesis process resulted in 12 recommendations. Due to the low quality of available evidence, most recommendations were formulated based on expert opinion. CONCLUSION: The experts achieved strong consensus, formulating 12 recommendations to support strategies aimed at universalising the use of videolaryngoscopy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Guidelines on strategies for the universal implementation of videolaryngoscopy
Popis výsledku anglicky
OBJECTIVE: The Airway Section of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Latin American Federation of Emergency Medicine (FLAME) and an international group of airway experts (IAG) aimed to establish multidisciplinary recommendations advocating for the universal use of videolaryngoscopy (VL) in both emergency and planned care settings. DESIGN: A committee of experts from the two national scientific societies and an international group of airway experts was convened. Relevant research questions aligning with the document's objective were identified. A rapid systematic review of the evidence was performed, and the quality of evidence was assessed. Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) The entire process was conducted independently of industry funding. METHODS: Six domains were defined pertaining to VL: Clinical Benefits; Infrastructure and Accessibility; Clinical Guidelines and Protocols; Teaching and Clinical Training; Dissemination and Promotion of Clinical Benefits; Innovation, Sustainability, and Research. For each domain, specific questions were developed using the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes). A literature search was conducted following PRISMA-R guidelines and analysed using the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: The synthesis process resulted in 12 recommendations. Due to the low quality of available evidence, most recommendations were formulated based on expert opinion. CONCLUSION: The experts achieved strong consensus, formulating 12 recommendations to support strategies aimed at universalising the use of videolaryngoscopy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30223 - Anaesthesiology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
ISSN
0265-0215
e-ISSN
1365-2346
Svazek periodika
42
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
10
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
872-888
Kód UT WoS článku
001565008900006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105009300008