European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on fitness for curative intent treatment of lung cancer

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10506625" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10506625 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/25:10506625 RIV/00064190:_____/25:10001423

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=EoW7X5P2yF" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=EoW7X5P2yF</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00156-2025" target="_blank" >10.1183/13993003.00156-2025</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on fitness for curative intent treatment of lung cancer

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

A multidisciplinary panel of lung cancer experts with a special interest in functional evaluation of lung cancer patients, and lung cancer patient representatives, has been facilitated by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the European Respiratory Society to provide healthcare professionals with practical and up-to-date recommendations for the assessment of patients&apos; fitness for curative intent treatments for lung cancer. The panel formulated four PICO (population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) questions and seven complementary narrative questions. Both types of questions were assigned to groups of at least two experts. A medical librarian conducted the literature searches, and the authors selected relevant studies based on predefined inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS (Quality in Prognosis Studies) tool. Data were summarised and the certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) and the Evidence to Decisions framework was used to formulate recommendations. A series of multidisciplinary recommendations was formulated about the utilisation of pulmonary function tests, split lung function values, exercise tests, cardiologic testing, and the role of prehabilitation, sublobar resections, risk scores and comorbidities in selecting patients for curative intent treatment.

Název v anglickém jazyce

European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on fitness for curative intent treatment of lung cancer

Popis výsledku anglicky

A multidisciplinary panel of lung cancer experts with a special interest in functional evaluation of lung cancer patients, and lung cancer patient representatives, has been facilitated by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the European Respiratory Society to provide healthcare professionals with practical and up-to-date recommendations for the assessment of patients&apos; fitness for curative intent treatments for lung cancer. The panel formulated four PICO (population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) questions and seven complementary narrative questions. Both types of questions were assigned to groups of at least two experts. A medical librarian conducted the literature searches, and the authors selected relevant studies based on predefined inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS (Quality in Prognosis Studies) tool. Data were summarised and the certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) and the Evidence to Decisions framework was used to formulate recommendations. A series of multidisciplinary recommendations was formulated about the utilisation of pulmonary function tests, split lung function values, exercise tests, cardiologic testing, and the role of prehabilitation, sublobar resections, risk scores and comorbidities in selecting patients for curative intent treatment.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30203 - Respiratory systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Respiratory Journal

ISSN

0903-1936

e-ISSN

1399-3003

Svazek periodika

66

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

39

Strana od-do

2500156

Kód UT WoS článku

001632383400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105021714885