Compensatory Exercise with Dual-Task using Kommo® for People with Sedentary Work
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10509526" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10509526 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11110/25:10509526
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DWM9-y8lF7" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DWM9-y8lF7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.58743/asv2025vol13no1.380" target="_blank" >10.58743/asv2025vol13no1.380</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Compensatory Exercise with Dual-Task using Kommo® for People with Sedentary Work
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: Sedentary work increases the risk of back pain and reduces physical capacity. Cognitive-motor (dual-task) training can influence attention, postural control, and pain perception. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a group compensatory exercise program using the Kommo(R) bar (dual-task approach) in sedentary workers and to assess its effects on spinal mobility and back pain. Methods: Fifteen participants (11 women, 4 men; aged 20-59 years, mean age 41.8; average sitting time 8.6 h/day) completed an 8-week intervention (one 60-minute group session per week). Spinal mobility was assessed using Čepoj's distance, Ott's distance (inclination and reclination), Schober's distance, Stibor's distance, and Thomayer's test. Functional mobility was evaluated with the Five Times Sit-to-Stand test and the Timed Up and Go test (including the cognitive variant, TUGcog). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Data were analyzed with paired t-tests, after testing for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results: All participants completed the program without complications (0% dropout). Significant improvements were observed in thoracic spine mobility (Ott, Stibor), functional mobility (5xSTS, TUG, TUGcog), and perceived back pain (VAS, McGill). Conclusion: An 8week compensatory exercise program with dual-task elements using the Kommo(R) bar is feasible and shows promise in reducing back pain and improving mobility in sedentary workers. Larger controlled studies are warranted.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Compensatory Exercise with Dual-Task using Kommo® for People with Sedentary Work
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: Sedentary work increases the risk of back pain and reduces physical capacity. Cognitive-motor (dual-task) training can influence attention, postural control, and pain perception. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a group compensatory exercise program using the Kommo(R) bar (dual-task approach) in sedentary workers and to assess its effects on spinal mobility and back pain. Methods: Fifteen participants (11 women, 4 men; aged 20-59 years, mean age 41.8; average sitting time 8.6 h/day) completed an 8-week intervention (one 60-minute group session per week). Spinal mobility was assessed using Čepoj's distance, Ott's distance (inclination and reclination), Schober's distance, Stibor's distance, and Thomayer's test. Functional mobility was evaluated with the Five Times Sit-to-Stand test and the Timed Up and Go test (including the cognitive variant, TUGcog). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Data were analyzed with paired t-tests, after testing for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results: All participants completed the program without complications (0% dropout). Significant improvements were observed in thoracic spine mobility (Ott, Stibor), functional mobility (5xSTS, TUG, TUGcog), and perceived back pain (VAS, McGill). Conclusion: An 8week compensatory exercise program with dual-task elements using the Kommo(R) bar is feasible and shows promise in reducing back pain and improving mobility in sedentary workers. Larger controlled studies are warranted.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30306 - Sport and fitness sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Salus Vitae
ISSN
1805-8787
e-ISSN
1805-8787
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
43-50
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—