Enamel surface roughness after orthodontic adhesive removal: an in vitro study comparing four clearance method

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F24%3A43927642" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/24:43927642 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11120/24:43927642

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241436650" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241436650</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241436650" target="_blank" >10.26650/eor.20241436650</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Enamel surface roughness after orthodontic adhesive removal: an in vitro study comparing four clearance method

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Purpose: Adhesive remnants removal is the last key step influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes. Four different clearance methods (CM) of orthodontic adhesive were evaluated to determine, which achieved the smoothest enamel surface in the shortest time. Materials and Methods: 75 intact premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were included, sixty had an orthodontic bracket bonded and subsequently removed, and fifteen served as the control group. Four CMs were used to clear the tooth surface of 15 premolars each: carbide bur (CB), carbide bur with titanium nitride surface treatment + fine carbide bur (CBCB), glass fiber-reinforced composite instrument (GFCB), zirconia bur + glass fiber-reinforced composite bur (ZBCB). The processing time was recorded. In ten premolars from each group, the enamel surface was evaluated by atomic force microscopy estimating mean roughness (Ra), roughness profile value (Rq), and roughness depth (Rt). Enamel Damage Index (EDI) was assessed with a scanning electron microscope on 5 remaining premolars. Results: Significant differences were observed in all evaluated parameters - Ra (p&lt;0.0001), Rq (p&lt;0.0001), and Rt (p&lt;0.0001). GFCB exhibited the smoothest surface in all parameters. The lowest EDI exhibited teeth treated by GFCB, however, the differences were not significant. Working with GFCB took the longest time (mean 116 s), and the shortest with CBCB (mean 49 s). Conclusion: Using CB is the fastest clearance method, but the enamel surface roughness was highest. Clearing with a set of instruments CBCB proved to be a fast method with satisfying remaining enamel roughness.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Enamel surface roughness after orthodontic adhesive removal: an in vitro study comparing four clearance method

Popis výsledku anglicky

Purpose: Adhesive remnants removal is the last key step influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes. Four different clearance methods (CM) of orthodontic adhesive were evaluated to determine, which achieved the smoothest enamel surface in the shortest time. Materials and Methods: 75 intact premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were included, sixty had an orthodontic bracket bonded and subsequently removed, and fifteen served as the control group. Four CMs were used to clear the tooth surface of 15 premolars each: carbide bur (CB), carbide bur with titanium nitride surface treatment + fine carbide bur (CBCB), glass fiber-reinforced composite instrument (GFCB), zirconia bur + glass fiber-reinforced composite bur (ZBCB). The processing time was recorded. In ten premolars from each group, the enamel surface was evaluated by atomic force microscopy estimating mean roughness (Ra), roughness profile value (Rq), and roughness depth (Rt). Enamel Damage Index (EDI) was assessed with a scanning electron microscope on 5 remaining premolars. Results: Significant differences were observed in all evaluated parameters - Ra (p&lt;0.0001), Rq (p&lt;0.0001), and Rt (p&lt;0.0001). GFCB exhibited the smoothest surface in all parameters. The lowest EDI exhibited teeth treated by GFCB, however, the differences were not significant. Working with GFCB took the longest time (mean 116 s), and the shortest with CBCB (mean 49 s). Conclusion: Using CB is the fastest clearance method, but the enamel surface roughness was highest. Clearing with a set of instruments CBCB proved to be a fast method with satisfying remaining enamel roughness.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30208 - Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Oral Research

ISSN

2630-6158

e-ISSN

2651-2823

Svazek periodika

58

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

TR - Turecká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

145-151

Kód UT WoS článku

001331142600006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85204732338