To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064190%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000042" target="_blank" >RIV/00064190:_____/19:N0000042 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11140/19:10397555 RIV/00669806:_____/19:10397555

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0149" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0149</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0149" target="_blank" >10.2217/cer-2018-0149</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim: We analyzed to what extent measurement protocol influenced individual blood pressure (BP) and achievement of treatment target in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: In a subsample of Czech EUROASPIRE III-V survey participants (n = 913), we compared the per-protocol BP measurement (by automated oscillometric device OMRON at the beginning of survey procedure) with control auscultatory measurement (by physician during interview). Results: Per-protocol approach produced significantly (p < 0.0001) higher BP values (by 9/6 mmHg in median) than auscultatory measurements and led to markedly higher proportion of patients over target BP (less than 140/ 90 mmHg; 59.3 vs 34.9% [p < 0.0001], per-protocol vs auscultatory technique, respectively). Conclusion: Per-protocol oscillometric technique was not equivalent to conventional auscultatory measurement and seriously over-rated the real nonachievement of BP target in observational surveys.

Název v anglickém jazyce

To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim: We analyzed to what extent measurement protocol influenced individual blood pressure (BP) and achievement of treatment target in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: In a subsample of Czech EUROASPIRE III-V survey participants (n = 913), we compared the per-protocol BP measurement (by automated oscillometric device OMRON at the beginning of survey procedure) with control auscultatory measurement (by physician during interview). Results: Per-protocol approach produced significantly (p < 0.0001) higher BP values (by 9/6 mmHg in median) than auscultatory measurements and led to markedly higher proportion of patients over target BP (less than 140/ 90 mmHg; 59.3 vs 34.9% [p < 0.0001], per-protocol vs auscultatory technique, respectively). Conclusion: Per-protocol oscillometric technique was not equivalent to conventional auscultatory measurement and seriously over-rated the real nonachievement of BP target in observational surveys.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NV17-29520A" target="_blank" >NV17-29520A: Dlouhodobé trendy sekundární prevence ICHS a predikce rizika ve vybraném vzorku české populace - česká část studie EURASPIRE V</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH

ISSN

2042-6305

e-ISSN

2042-6313

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

841-852

Kód UT WoS článku

000489284500002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85071739766