Using questionnaires to detect obstructive sleep apnoe

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064190%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000082" target="_blank" >RIV/00064190:_____/20:N0000082 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33678/cor.2019.086" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.33678/cor.2019.086</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33678/cor.2019.086" target="_blank" >10.33678/cor.2019.086</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Using questionnaires to detect obstructive sleep apnoe

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnoe (OSA) syndrome is a serious and rather frequent condition remaining largely undiagnosed and, therefore, untreated. A possible way how to improve the detection of OSA in the general population is the employment of dedicated questionnaires to preselect high-risk individuals. Objectives: The aim of this review is to compare sensitivity and specificity of questionnaires developed to preselect patients with clinically relevant OSA. Methods: Based on eligibility criteria, we selected studies focusing on the sensitivity and specificity of each of the following questionnaires: the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the STOP-BANG (SBQ), comparing their sensitivity and specificity with polysomnography, considered as the gold standard with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >= 15 being clinically relevant. Results: When compared with polysomnography, the mean sensitivity of the BQ, ESS and SBQ to detect AHI >= 15 was found to be 58.8-76%, 39-75% and 66-93%, respectively; similarly, their specificity was 39-63%, 48-71% and 40.5-74%. Conclusions: In patients with clinically relevant OSA, the BQ and SBQ showed high sensitivity with only medium specificity, thus resulting in high false positivity. Whereas Epworth Sleepiness Scale displayed in patients with clinically relevant OSA medium sensitivity and specificity, being, therefore, less suitable to detect high-risk patients, patients with a positive questionnaire should be referred to centers for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Using questionnaires to detect obstructive sleep apnoe

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnoe (OSA) syndrome is a serious and rather frequent condition remaining largely undiagnosed and, therefore, untreated. A possible way how to improve the detection of OSA in the general population is the employment of dedicated questionnaires to preselect high-risk individuals. Objectives: The aim of this review is to compare sensitivity and specificity of questionnaires developed to preselect patients with clinically relevant OSA. Methods: Based on eligibility criteria, we selected studies focusing on the sensitivity and specificity of each of the following questionnaires: the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the STOP-BANG (SBQ), comparing their sensitivity and specificity with polysomnography, considered as the gold standard with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >= 15 being clinically relevant. Results: When compared with polysomnography, the mean sensitivity of the BQ, ESS and SBQ to detect AHI >= 15 was found to be 58.8-76%, 39-75% and 66-93%, respectively; similarly, their specificity was 39-63%, 48-71% and 40.5-74%. Conclusions: In patients with clinically relevant OSA, the BQ and SBQ showed high sensitivity with only medium specificity, thus resulting in high false positivity. Whereas Epworth Sleepiness Scale displayed in patients with clinically relevant OSA medium sensitivity and specificity, being, therefore, less suitable to detect high-risk patients, patients with a positive questionnaire should be referred to centers for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

COR ET VASA

ISSN

0010-8650

e-ISSN

1803-7712

Svazek periodika

62

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

44-49

Kód UT WoS článku

000517557800007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85087960922