Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with and without end-stage liver disease have similar outcomes after liver transplantation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064190%3A_____%2F26%3A10001441" target="_blank" >RIV/00064190:_____/26:10001441 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i3.112934" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i3.112934</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i3.112934" target="_blank" >10.4254/wjh.v18.i3.112934</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with and without end-stage liver disease have similar outcomes after liver transplantation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for the advanced stages of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). However, up to 30% of patients develop recurrence of PSC (rPSC), which negatively affects graft and patient outcomes. Given the heterogeneous nature of PSC, patients undergo LT either due to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) or to symptoms that significantly reduce quality of life (non-ESLD), such as recurrent bacterial cholangitis or refractory pruritus. However, it remains unclear whether these indicators influence post-LT outcomes. AIM To compare post-LT outcomes between PSC recipients with ESLD and non-ESLD indications, and identify rPSC and graft failure risk factors. METHODS This single-center retrospective study comprised 131 adult LT recipients for PSC (including PSC/autoimmune overlap). Patients were grouped by listing indication for comparison of ESLD vs non-ESLD. ESLD was defined as model for ESLD score >= 15 and Child-Pugh score >= 8, or >= 1 sign of decompensated cirrhosis. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models with time-updated covariates. RESULTS No significant difference was found in the incidence of rPSC, graft survival, or overall survival between patients indicated for LT for ESLD and those with non-advanced symptomatic disease. Cytomegalovirus infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-4.46), acute cellular rejection (ACR) (HR = 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44-10.8), and length of hospitalization after LT (HR = 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.04) were significantly associated with risk of rPSC. In addition, multiple episodes of ACR (HR = 4.93; 95%CI: 1.22-19.9) and the length of hospitalization after LT (HR = 1.04; 95%CI: 1.01-1.06) were significantly associated with graft failure. CONCLUSION Patients with PSC with advanced liver cirrhosis before LT did not have worse post-transplant outcomes than those without ESLD. Cytomegalovirus infection, ACR, and prolonged hospitalization after LT were associated with worse outcomes after LT in PSC.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with and without end-stage liver disease have similar outcomes after liver transplantation
Popis výsledku anglicky
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for the advanced stages of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). However, up to 30% of patients develop recurrence of PSC (rPSC), which negatively affects graft and patient outcomes. Given the heterogeneous nature of PSC, patients undergo LT either due to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) or to symptoms that significantly reduce quality of life (non-ESLD), such as recurrent bacterial cholangitis or refractory pruritus. However, it remains unclear whether these indicators influence post-LT outcomes. AIM To compare post-LT outcomes between PSC recipients with ESLD and non-ESLD indications, and identify rPSC and graft failure risk factors. METHODS This single-center retrospective study comprised 131 adult LT recipients for PSC (including PSC/autoimmune overlap). Patients were grouped by listing indication for comparison of ESLD vs non-ESLD. ESLD was defined as model for ESLD score >= 15 and Child-Pugh score >= 8, or >= 1 sign of decompensated cirrhosis. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models with time-updated covariates. RESULTS No significant difference was found in the incidence of rPSC, graft survival, or overall survival between patients indicated for LT for ESLD and those with non-advanced symptomatic disease. Cytomegalovirus infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-4.46), acute cellular rejection (ACR) (HR = 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44-10.8), and length of hospitalization after LT (HR = 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.04) were significantly associated with risk of rPSC. In addition, multiple episodes of ACR (HR = 4.93; 95%CI: 1.22-19.9) and the length of hospitalization after LT (HR = 1.04; 95%CI: 1.01-1.06) were significantly associated with graft failure. CONCLUSION Patients with PSC with advanced liver cirrhosis before LT did not have worse post-transplant outcomes than those without ESLD. Cytomegalovirus infection, ACR, and prolonged hospitalization after LT were associated with worse outcomes after LT in PSC.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2026
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
World Journal of Hepatology
ISSN
1948-5182
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
nestránkováno
Kód UT WoS článku
001732559500007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105037580808