Should a Second Transurethral Resection Be Performed in All Patients with T1 or High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F11%3A7069" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/11:7069 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11130/11:7069
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569905611000297" target="_blank" >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569905611000297</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Should a Second Transurethral Resection Be Performed in All Patients with T1 or High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Context: Transurethral resection (TUR) is a critical step in the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Because of the high risk of tumour persistence and understaging, the routine second TUR performed after 2-6 wk is recommended by European Association of Urology guidelines in all patients with T1 or high-grade NMIBC. Objective: To summarise arguments that support the recommendation of routine second TUR in all patients with T1 or high-grade NMIBC. Evidence acquisition: Data and arguments were retrieved from a critically selected list of articles and abstracts dealing with the surgical treatment of NMIBC. Evidence synthesis: In patients with T1 tumours, the risk of tumour persistence and tumour understaging detected by the second TUR was 33-78% and 2-28%, respectively. The pathologic finding achieved by second TUR can modify the treatment strategy in a significant number of patients. Correct staging in NMIBC enables the selection of the optimal treatment modality an
Název v anglickém jazyce
Should a Second Transurethral Resection Be Performed in All Patients with T1 or High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Context: Transurethral resection (TUR) is a critical step in the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Because of the high risk of tumour persistence and understaging, the routine second TUR performed after 2-6 wk is recommended by European Association of Urology guidelines in all patients with T1 or high-grade NMIBC. Objective: To summarise arguments that support the recommendation of routine second TUR in all patients with T1 or high-grade NMIBC. Evidence acquisition: Data and arguments were retrieved from a critically selected list of articles and abstracts dealing with the surgical treatment of NMIBC. Evidence synthesis: In patients with T1 tumours, the risk of tumour persistence and tumour understaging detected by the second TUR was 33-78% and 2-28%, respectively. The pathologic finding achieved by second TUR can modify the treatment strategy in a significant number of patients. Correct staging in NMIBC enables the selection of the optimal treatment modality an
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FE - Ostatní obory vnitřního lékařství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Urology Supplements
ISSN
1569-9056
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
"E8"-"E11"
Kód UT WoS článku
000290726700003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—