Comparison of mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting for moderate versus critical stenosis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F12%3A7984" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/12:7984 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/12:7984

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27285" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27285</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting for moderate versus critical stenosis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: Little is known about the prognosis of moderate versus critical carotid stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting (CAS). Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a single-centre registry including 271 consecutive patients (69 +/- 9 years, 87% at high risk for surgery), in whom 308 procedures were performed. The study included both symptomatic (>= 50% carotid artery stenosis) and asymptomatic (>= 70% carotid artery stenosis) patients. The primary endpoint was the rate ofadverse events during follow-up (range 1-48 months), defined as all-cause death or stroke. Results: We treated 115 critical and 193 moderate stenoses and implanted 318 stents (56% with closed cell design). Embolic protection systems were used in 296 cases (96%). The technical success rate was 98.2% in the critical stenoses group and 99% in the moderate group (NS). During follow-up, the incidence of the primary endpoint was 12.9% (13 pts) in the critical stenoses group and 14.7% (25 pts)

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting for moderate versus critical stenosis

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: Little is known about the prognosis of moderate versus critical carotid stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting (CAS). Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a single-centre registry including 271 consecutive patients (69 +/- 9 years, 87% at high risk for surgery), in whom 308 procedures were performed. The study included both symptomatic (>= 50% carotid artery stenosis) and asymptomatic (>= 70% carotid artery stenosis) patients. The primary endpoint was the rate ofadverse events during follow-up (range 1-48 months), defined as all-cause death or stroke. Results: We treated 115 critical and 193 moderate stenoses and implanted 318 stents (56% with closed cell design). Embolic protection systems were used in 296 cases (96%). The technical success rate was 98.2% in the critical stenoses group and 99% in the moderate group (NS). During follow-up, the incidence of the primary endpoint was 12.9% (13 pts) in the critical stenoses group and 14.7% (25 pts)

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Archives of Medical Science

ISSN

1734-1922

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

75-80

Kód UT WoS článku

000301553600016

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—