Differences in evaluation methods of trunk sway using different MoCap systems
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F14%3A10292838" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/14:10292838 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21460/14:00221616 RIV/00216208:11130/14:10292838 RIV/61989592:15510/14:33149220
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/abb140210" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/abb140210</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/abb140210" target="_blank" >10.5277/abb140210</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Differences in evaluation methods of trunk sway using different MoCap systems
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The position of the trunk can be negatively influenced by many diseases. Several methods can be used for identifying defects in balance and coordination as a result of pathology of the musculoskeletal or nervous system. The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between the three methods used for analysis of trunk sway and compare two fundamentally different MoCap systems. We used a camera system and a 3DOF orientation tracker placed on subject's trunk, and measured inclination (roll) and flexion (pitch) during quiet stance. Ten healthy participants in the study were measured with eyes open and closed. The pitch versus roll plots of trunk were formed, and the area of the convex hull, area of confidence ellipse and total length of the trajectory of the pitch versus roll plot were calculated. The statistical analysis was performed and strong correlation between the area of the convex hull and area of the confidence ellipse was found. Also, the results show moderate correlatio
Název v anglickém jazyce
Differences in evaluation methods of trunk sway using different MoCap systems
Popis výsledku anglicky
The position of the trunk can be negatively influenced by many diseases. Several methods can be used for identifying defects in balance and coordination as a result of pathology of the musculoskeletal or nervous system. The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between the three methods used for analysis of trunk sway and compare two fundamentally different MoCap systems. We used a camera system and a 3DOF orientation tracker placed on subject's trunk, and measured inclination (roll) and flexion (pitch) during quiet stance. Ten healthy participants in the study were measured with eyes open and closed. The pitch versus roll plots of trunk were formed, and the area of the convex hull, area of confidence ellipse and total length of the trajectory of the pitch versus roll plot were calculated. The statistical analysis was performed and strong correlation between the area of the convex hull and area of the confidence ellipse was found. Also, the results show moderate correlatio
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
BO - Biofyzika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/VG20102015002" target="_blank" >VG20102015002: Osobní bezpečnostní dohledový systém pro podporu výcviku a zásahu jednotek IZS</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
ISSN
1509-409X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
85-94
Kód UT WoS článku
000340324900010
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—