Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10323116" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10323116 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/16:10323116

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction Differences in hand-muscle strength/dexterity between dominant (DH) and non-dominant (NDH) hand in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are not wellunderstood. Purpose of the study To compare muscle strength/dexterity between DH and NDH and to correlate manual dexterity, strength and sensory function. Patients and methods Thirty CMT patients were studied using functional muscle testing (FMT) and strength (dynamometry), dexterity (the Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT]), and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function [JTT]), and sensory function (the Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA]). Results Scores were worse for DH than NDH on FMT (p = 0.043) and NHPT (p = 0.014) but not on JTT (p = 0.098), handgrip strength (p = 0.710) or tripod pinch (p = 0.645). NSA did not correlate significantly with any tests (p's0.05). Conclusions In CMT disease, DH appears more impaired than NDH in terms of function and dexterity. Greater muscle weakness in DH may also emerge as CMT progresses.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction Differences in hand-muscle strength/dexterity between dominant (DH) and non-dominant (NDH) hand in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are not wellunderstood. Purpose of the study To compare muscle strength/dexterity between DH and NDH and to correlate manual dexterity, strength and sensory function. Patients and methods Thirty CMT patients were studied using functional muscle testing (FMT) and strength (dynamometry), dexterity (the Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT]), and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function [JTT]), and sensory function (the Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA]). Results Scores were worse for DH than NDH on FMT (p = 0.043) and NHPT (p = 0.014) but not on JTT (p = 0.098), handgrip strength (p = 0.710) or tripod pinch (p = 0.645). NSA did not correlate significantly with any tests (p's0.05). Conclusions In CMT disease, DH appears more impaired than NDH in terms of function and dexterity. Greater muscle weakness in DH may also emerge as CMT progresses.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Hand Therapy

ISSN

0894-1130

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

29

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

66-72

Kód UT WoS článku

000370212900010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84977617584