Diagnostic Efficiency of Serum and Urine Procathepsin B and Cathepsin B in Patients with Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10327955" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10327955 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11130/16:10327955
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160135" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160135</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160135" target="_blank" >10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160135</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Diagnostic Efficiency of Serum and Urine Procathepsin B and Cathepsin B in Patients with Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of cathepsins B (cathepsin B and procathepsin B) in patients with transient cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Methods: Serum and urine concentrations of cathepsin B and procathepsin B were measured by two commercially available enzymatic immunoassays in a group of 125 patients with bladder cell carcinoma without metastases and in a group of 72 healthy individuals. Concentrations in urine were adjusted to creatinine. Results: Concentrations of both cathepsin B and procathepsin B in serum and urine were significantly elevated in patients with bladder cell carcinoma (p < 0.0001 for U-procathepsin B, U-procathepsin B/creatinine, and U-cathepsin B/creatinine, p = 0.0001 for U-cathepsin B, p = 0.0002 for S-procathepsin B and p = 0.02 for S-cathepsin B). Comparison of all diagnostic efficiencies of cathepsin B and procathepsin B in serum and in urine showed the best diagnostic accuracy for procathepsin B in urine (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.50). The ratio of U-procathepsin B/creatinine was also more efficient than the ratio of U-cathepsin B/creatinine (AUC = 0.81 vs. AUC = 0.70). The diagnostic efficiencies of both parameters in serum were low (S-procathepsin B: AUC = 0.50, S-cathepsin B: AUC = 0.60). U-procathepsin B and U-procathepsin B/creatinine ratio show significantly better diagnostic efficiency in patients with invasive bladder tumors than other parameters (S-procathepsin B, S-cathepsin B, U-cathepsin B and U-Cathepsin B/creatinine; U-procathepsin B: AUC = 0.82, U-procathepsin B/creatinine: AUC = 0.86, S-procathepsin B and cathepsin B: AUC = 0.51 - 0.68). Conclusions: Procathepsin B concentration in urine is a valuable diagnostic marker in patients with bladder cell carcinoma.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Diagnostic Efficiency of Serum and Urine Procathepsin B and Cathepsin B in Patients with Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of cathepsins B (cathepsin B and procathepsin B) in patients with transient cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Methods: Serum and urine concentrations of cathepsin B and procathepsin B were measured by two commercially available enzymatic immunoassays in a group of 125 patients with bladder cell carcinoma without metastases and in a group of 72 healthy individuals. Concentrations in urine were adjusted to creatinine. Results: Concentrations of both cathepsin B and procathepsin B in serum and urine were significantly elevated in patients with bladder cell carcinoma (p < 0.0001 for U-procathepsin B, U-procathepsin B/creatinine, and U-cathepsin B/creatinine, p = 0.0001 for U-cathepsin B, p = 0.0002 for S-procathepsin B and p = 0.02 for S-cathepsin B). Comparison of all diagnostic efficiencies of cathepsin B and procathepsin B in serum and in urine showed the best diagnostic accuracy for procathepsin B in urine (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.50). The ratio of U-procathepsin B/creatinine was also more efficient than the ratio of U-cathepsin B/creatinine (AUC = 0.81 vs. AUC = 0.70). The diagnostic efficiencies of both parameters in serum were low (S-procathepsin B: AUC = 0.50, S-cathepsin B: AUC = 0.60). U-procathepsin B and U-procathepsin B/creatinine ratio show significantly better diagnostic efficiency in patients with invasive bladder tumors than other parameters (S-procathepsin B, S-cathepsin B, U-cathepsin B and U-Cathepsin B/creatinine; U-procathepsin B: AUC = 0.82, U-procathepsin B/creatinine: AUC = 0.86, S-procathepsin B and cathepsin B: AUC = 0.51 - 0.68). Conclusions: Procathepsin B concentration in urine is a valuable diagnostic marker in patients with bladder cell carcinoma.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
CE - Biochemie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NT11415" target="_blank" >NT11415: Aktivita katepsinu B u karcinomu močového měchýře</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Clinical Laboratory
ISSN
1433-6510
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
62
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1709-1715
Kód UT WoS článku
000383317300015
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—