Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F22%3A10442602" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/22:10442602 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61383082:_____/22:00001169 RIV/00216208:11110/22:10442602 RIV/00216208:11130/22:10442602 RIV/68407700:21460/22:00357667 RIV/68407700:21730/22:00357667
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KEyMs~JHqH" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KEyMs~JHqH</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.FOCUS21733" target="_blank" >10.3171/2022.1.FOCUS21733</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
OBJECTIVE: Phase-contrast MRI allows detailed measurements of various parameters of CSF motion. This examination is technically demanding and machine dependent. The literature on this topic is ambiguous. Machine learning (ML) approaches have already been successfully utilized in medical research, but none have yet been applied to enhance the results of CSF flowmetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ML algorithms in enhancing the utilization and results of MRI flowmetry in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) diagnostics. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 30 iNPH patients and 15 healthy controls examined on one MRI machine. All major phase-contrast parameters were inspected: peak positive, peak negative, and average velocities; peak amplitude; positive, negative, and average flow rates; and aqueductal area. The authors applied ML algorithms to 85 complex features calculated from a phase-contrast study. RESULTS: The most distinctive parameters with p < 0.005 were the peak negative velocity, peak amplitude, and negative flow. From the ML algorithms, the Adaptive Boosting classifier showed the highest specificity and best discrimination potential overall, with 80.4% +- 2.9% accuracy, 72.0% +- 5.6% sensitivity, 84.7% +- 3.8% specificity, and 0.812 +- 0.047 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The highest sensitivity was 85.7% +- 5.6%, reached by the Gaussian Naive Bayes model, and the best AUC was 0.854 +- 0.028 by the Extra Trees classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Feature extraction algorithms combined with ML approaches simplify the utilization of phase-contrast MRI. The highest-performing ML algorithm was Adaptive Boosting, which showed good calibration and discrimination on the testing data, with 80.4% accuracy, 72.0% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.812 AUC. Phase-contrast MRI boosted by the ML approach can help to determine shunt-responsive iNPH patients.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach
Popis výsledku anglicky
OBJECTIVE: Phase-contrast MRI allows detailed measurements of various parameters of CSF motion. This examination is technically demanding and machine dependent. The literature on this topic is ambiguous. Machine learning (ML) approaches have already been successfully utilized in medical research, but none have yet been applied to enhance the results of CSF flowmetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ML algorithms in enhancing the utilization and results of MRI flowmetry in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) diagnostics. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 30 iNPH patients and 15 healthy controls examined on one MRI machine. All major phase-contrast parameters were inspected: peak positive, peak negative, and average velocities; peak amplitude; positive, negative, and average flow rates; and aqueductal area. The authors applied ML algorithms to 85 complex features calculated from a phase-contrast study. RESULTS: The most distinctive parameters with p < 0.005 were the peak negative velocity, peak amplitude, and negative flow. From the ML algorithms, the Adaptive Boosting classifier showed the highest specificity and best discrimination potential overall, with 80.4% +- 2.9% accuracy, 72.0% +- 5.6% sensitivity, 84.7% +- 3.8% specificity, and 0.812 +- 0.047 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The highest sensitivity was 85.7% +- 5.6%, reached by the Gaussian Naive Bayes model, and the best AUC was 0.854 +- 0.028 by the Extra Trees classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Feature extraction algorithms combined with ML approaches simplify the utilization of phase-contrast MRI. The highest-performing ML algorithm was Adaptive Boosting, which showed good calibration and discrimination on the testing data, with 80.4% accuracy, 72.0% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.812 AUC. Phase-contrast MRI boosted by the ML approach can help to determine shunt-responsive iNPH patients.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Neurosurgical Focus
ISSN
1092-0684
e-ISSN
1092-0684
Svazek periodika
52
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
E6
Kód UT WoS článku
000781114400003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85127511467