Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Comparable outcomes after busulfan- or treosulfan-based conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL: results of FORUM

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F25%3A10487956" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/25:10487956 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11130/25:10487956

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8WcYM1FZk" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8WcYM1FZk</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014548" target="_blank" >10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014548</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Comparable outcomes after busulfan- or treosulfan-based conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL: results of FORUM

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The superiority of TBI-based versus chemotherapy-conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL has been established in the international, prospective phase-III FORUM study (#NCT01949129), randomizing 417 patients &lt;= 18 years at diagnosis (4-21 years at HSCT) in CR, transplanted from HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donors. Due to the unavailability of TBI in some regions and to accommodate individual contraindications, this study reports the pre-specified comparison of outcomes of patients receiving busulfan-based (BU) or treosulfan-based (TREO) regimens from 2013 to 2018. 180 and 128 patients (median age 9.9 years) received BU/THIO/FLU or TREO/THIO/FLU, respectively. Data were analysed as of 02/2023, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.3-9.1). Three-year overall survival was 0.71 (0.64-0.77) (BU/THIO/FLU) and 0.72 (0.63-0.79) (TREO/THIO/FLU), event-free survival was 0.60 (0.53-0.67) (BU/THIO/FLU) and 0.55 (0.46-0.63) (TREO/THIO/FLU), with both p = NS. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (0.31 (0.25-0.38) BU, 0.36 (0.27-0.44) TREO, p = 0.779) and non-relapse mortality (0.08 (0.05-0.13) BU, 0.09 (0.05-0.15) TREO, p = 0.831) were comparable (p = NS). One case of fatal veno-occlusive disease occurred in each group. No significant differences in acute and chronic GvHD or GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (0.48 (0.41-0.55) BU, 0.45 (0.37-0.54) TREO, p = 0.89) were recorded. Outcomes for CR1 or CR2 patients were similar irrespective of the regimen used. In conclusion, BU/THIO/FLU or TREO/THIO/FLU regimens can be an alternative to TBI for ALL patients &gt; 4 years with contraindications or lack of access to TBI.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Comparable outcomes after busulfan- or treosulfan-based conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL: results of FORUM

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The superiority of TBI-based versus chemotherapy-conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL has been established in the international, prospective phase-III FORUM study (#NCT01949129), randomizing 417 patients &lt;= 18 years at diagnosis (4-21 years at HSCT) in CR, transplanted from HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donors. Due to the unavailability of TBI in some regions and to accommodate individual contraindications, this study reports the pre-specified comparison of outcomes of patients receiving busulfan-based (BU) or treosulfan-based (TREO) regimens from 2013 to 2018. 180 and 128 patients (median age 9.9 years) received BU/THIO/FLU or TREO/THIO/FLU, respectively. Data were analysed as of 02/2023, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.3-9.1). Three-year overall survival was 0.71 (0.64-0.77) (BU/THIO/FLU) and 0.72 (0.63-0.79) (TREO/THIO/FLU), event-free survival was 0.60 (0.53-0.67) (BU/THIO/FLU) and 0.55 (0.46-0.63) (TREO/THIO/FLU), with both p = NS. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (0.31 (0.25-0.38) BU, 0.36 (0.27-0.44) TREO, p = 0.779) and non-relapse mortality (0.08 (0.05-0.13) BU, 0.09 (0.05-0.15) TREO, p = 0.831) were comparable (p = NS). One case of fatal veno-occlusive disease occurred in each group. No significant differences in acute and chronic GvHD or GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (0.48 (0.41-0.55) BU, 0.45 (0.37-0.54) TREO, p = 0.89) were recorded. Outcomes for CR1 or CR2 patients were similar irrespective of the regimen used. In conclusion, BU/THIO/FLU or TREO/THIO/FLU regimens can be an alternative to TBI for ALL patients &gt; 4 years with contraindications or lack of access to TBI.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30205 - Hematology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Blood Advances

  • ISSN

    2473-9529

  • e-ISSN

    2473-9537

  • Svazek periodika

    9

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

    741-751

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001434919100001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85218727644