Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacists' Interventions in the Czech Republic

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064211%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000018" target="_blank" >RIV/00064211:_____/16:N0000018 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/62157124:16370/16:43874455

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27270831" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27270831</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1777" target="_blank" >10.1002/phar.1777</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacists' Interventions in the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    STUDY OBJECTIVES To determine the frequency of interventions, categorized by type of intervention and therapeutic class, made by a team of four clinical pharmacists over a 1-year period, and to assess the potential economic impact of these interventions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Clinical pharmacists' interventions were categorized by therapeutic class and divided into eight types: introduction of a drug, discontinuation of a drug, dosage change, route of administration change, recommendation to continue therapy, recommendation to perform further evaluation (e. g., laboratory assessment), reintroduction of a missing medication, and therapeutic drug monitoring (request to measure a drug concentration and provide its interpretation). All interventions accepted by the attending physicians were recorded by using a software application. For the evaluation of the economic impact of the interventions, published statistical data were used from the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. During the 1year period, the clinical pharmacists performed 1916 interventions. The most frequent intervention was drug discontinuation (27.9% of all interventions), and the drug category with the highest frequency of interventions was central nervous system drugs (25.1%). All interventions were accepted by the physicians. For the evaluation of potential economic impact, a select group of drugs was used, representing 14.4% of the interventions. The benefit: cost ratio was 3: 1.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacists' Interventions in the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    STUDY OBJECTIVES To determine the frequency of interventions, categorized by type of intervention and therapeutic class, made by a team of four clinical pharmacists over a 1-year period, and to assess the potential economic impact of these interventions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Clinical pharmacists' interventions were categorized by therapeutic class and divided into eight types: introduction of a drug, discontinuation of a drug, dosage change, route of administration change, recommendation to continue therapy, recommendation to perform further evaluation (e. g., laboratory assessment), reintroduction of a missing medication, and therapeutic drug monitoring (request to measure a drug concentration and provide its interpretation). All interventions accepted by the attending physicians were recorded by using a software application. For the evaluation of the economic impact of the interventions, published statistical data were used from the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. During the 1year period, the clinical pharmacists performed 1916 interventions. The most frequent intervention was drug discontinuation (27.9% of all interventions), and the drug category with the highest frequency of interventions was central nervous system drugs (25.1%). All interventions were accepted by the physicians. For the evaluation of potential economic impact, a select group of drugs was used, representing 14.4% of the interventions. The benefit: cost ratio was 3: 1.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

  • CEP obor

    FR - Farmakologie a lékárnická chemie

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    PHARMACOTHERAPY

  • ISSN

    0277-0008

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    36

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    7

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    766-773

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000383595600154

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus