(2940-2941) Proposals to conserve the name Amanita fulva with a conserved type against Agaricus badius and Agaricus trilobus and the name Amanita spadicea with a conserved type (Basidiomycota)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00094862%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000046" target="_blank" >RIV/00094862:_____/23:N0000046 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12916" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12916</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tax.12916" target="_blank" >10.1002/tax.12916</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

(2940-2941) Proposals to conserve the name Amanita fulva with a conserved type against Agaricus badius and Agaricus trilobus and the name Amanita spadicea with a conserved type (Basidiomycota)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

By these typifications, Agaricus trilobus and Amanita badia are fixed as earlier synonyms of Am. fulva (Art. 11.4). However, considering the broad use of the latter name during two centuries, we believe that replacing it by Am. badia would introduce much disturbance, as mentions of that name are few and ambiguous (24 bibliographic mentions found, at least 3 of them illustrating Am. fulvoides), whereas Am. fulva scores at least 137 mentions in European literature, including popular books and identification guides. Furthermore, Ag. trilo- bus, which would take precedence over Am. fulva as a homotypic synonym, has never been in use during the last two centuries. For this reason, we think that conservation of Am. fulva with the proposed conserved type would contribute to the stability of nomenclature in this group, in contrast to the revival of a name with multiple interpretations and another (“trilobus”) having never been in use and with an epithet referring to a feature without taxonomic significance. Amanita spadicea could be lectotypified by one of the two elements cited by Persoon in the protologue: t. CCXLV of Schaeffer (1771), which is the lectotype of Agaricus badius, or by t. CXV (1762), which is referable to Am. fulva, making Am. spadicea a homotypic synonym of one of the two names. This would force the creation of a new name for a well-defined species currently named Am. spadicea. Our aim here is to avoid this unnecessary nomenclatural move, by preserving Am. spadicea in an unequivocal interpretation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

(2940-2941) Proposals to conserve the name Amanita fulva with a conserved type against Agaricus badius and Agaricus trilobus and the name Amanita spadicea with a conserved type (Basidiomycota)

Popis výsledku anglicky

By these typifications, Agaricus trilobus and Amanita badia are fixed as earlier synonyms of Am. fulva (Art. 11.4). However, considering the broad use of the latter name during two centuries, we believe that replacing it by Am. badia would introduce much disturbance, as mentions of that name are few and ambiguous (24 bibliographic mentions found, at least 3 of them illustrating Am. fulvoides), whereas Am. fulva scores at least 137 mentions in European literature, including popular books and identification guides. Furthermore, Ag. trilo- bus, which would take precedence over Am. fulva as a homotypic synonym, has never been in use during the last two centuries. For this reason, we think that conservation of Am. fulva with the proposed conserved type would contribute to the stability of nomenclature in this group, in contrast to the revival of a name with multiple interpretations and another (“trilobus”) having never been in use and with an epithet referring to a feature without taxonomic significance. Amanita spadicea could be lectotypified by one of the two elements cited by Persoon in the protologue: t. CCXLV of Schaeffer (1771), which is the lectotype of Agaricus badius, or by t. CXV (1762), which is referable to Am. fulva, making Am. spadicea a homotypic synonym of one of the two names. This would force the creation of a new name for a well-defined species currently named Am. spadicea. Our aim here is to avoid this unnecessary nomenclatural move, by preserving Am. spadicea in an unequivocal interpretation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10612 - Mycology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Taxon

ISSN

0040-0262

e-ISSN

1996-8175

Svazek periodika

72

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

3

Strana od-do

425–427

Kód UT WoS článku

001011038500013

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85153721495