Effect of a Multicomponent Sleep Protocol on Sleep Quality in Conscious Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000105" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/20:N0000105 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/1067221.pdf" target="_blank" >https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/1067221.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtsm.galenos.2020.08208" target="_blank" >10.4274/jtsm.galenos.2020.08208</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Effect of a Multicomponent Sleep Protocol on Sleep Quality in Conscious Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objective: Sleep disruption is common in patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU), and it is associated with various negative effects. This study aimed to investigate whether the implementation of a multicomponent sleep protocol improved the quality of sleep, both subjectively (assessed with a questionnaire) and objectively (measured using actigraphy). Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional non-randomized controlled study compared two groups (PRE and POST groups) of 20 spontaneously conscious ICU patients. Results: Subjectively evaluated sleep quality was poor in the entire sample (n=40) [Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) total 49.2±25.1]. The mean total sleep time was 389.0±78.8 min, the Sleep Efficiency index (SEI) was 81.1±16.4%, and the number of awakenings per night was 18.4±9.79. The quality of sleep (both subjective and objective) was not significantly improved following the application of the sleep protocol (POST group), as inferred from most of the studied parameters. Subjective assessment yielded better results (RCSQ total: 45.1 PRE vs 51.1 POST); however, they were not statistically significant. Paradoxically, statistically significantly better results were observed for SEI (86.6% PRE vs 75.9% POST, p=0.044), total sleep time (416 min PRE vs 364 min POST, p=0.044), and noise (T=2.11, p=0.046) in the control group. Conclusion: Although the results failed to confirm that the multicomponent protocol exerted a significant effect, its implementation in clinical practice may be valuable. In a selected group of ICU patients, the proposed interventions may aid in achieving good sleep and in improving their overall comfort.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Effect of a Multicomponent Sleep Protocol on Sleep Quality in Conscious Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objective: Sleep disruption is common in patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU), and it is associated with various negative effects. This study aimed to investigate whether the implementation of a multicomponent sleep protocol improved the quality of sleep, both subjectively (assessed with a questionnaire) and objectively (measured using actigraphy). Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional non-randomized controlled study compared two groups (PRE and POST groups) of 20 spontaneously conscious ICU patients. Results: Subjectively evaluated sleep quality was poor in the entire sample (n=40) [Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) total 49.2±25.1]. The mean total sleep time was 389.0±78.8 min, the Sleep Efficiency index (SEI) was 81.1±16.4%, and the number of awakenings per night was 18.4±9.79. The quality of sleep (both subjective and objective) was not significantly improved following the application of the sleep protocol (POST group), as inferred from most of the studied parameters. Subjective assessment yielded better results (RCSQ total: 45.1 PRE vs 51.1 POST); however, they were not statistically significant. Paradoxically, statistically significantly better results were observed for SEI (86.6% PRE vs 75.9% POST, p=0.044), total sleep time (416 min PRE vs 364 min POST, p=0.044), and noise (T=2.11, p=0.046) in the control group. Conclusion: Although the results failed to confirm that the multicomponent protocol exerted a significant effect, its implementation in clinical practice may be valuable. In a selected group of ICU patients, the proposed interventions may aid in achieving good sleep and in improving their overall comfort.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30210 - Clinical neurology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Turkish Sleep Medicine
ISSN
2148-1504
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
7
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
TR - Turecká republika
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
140-148
Kód UT WoS článku
000579120800006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—