Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F24%3A10158741" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/24:10158741 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.dovepress.com/resilience-in-rectal-cancer-treatment-lessons-from-the-covid-19-era-in-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRM" target="_blank" >https://www.dovepress.com/resilience-in-rectal-cancer-treatment-lessons-from-the-covid-19-era-in-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRM</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S455332" target="_blank" >10.2147/TCRM.S455332</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Introduction: The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018–2019). Results: A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The “surgery-adjuvant therapy” interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219). Conclusion: Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Introduction: The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018–2019). Results: A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The “surgery-adjuvant therapy” interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219). Conclusion: Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30204 - Oncology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/NU22-C-113" target="_blank" >NU22-C-113: Vliv pandemie COVID-19 na chirurgickou péči o pacienty se solidním nádorem zažívacího traktu v ČR</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    1178-203X

  • Svazek periodika

    20

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    June

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NZ - Nový Zéland

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    373-379

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001248758200001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85197107212