Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F24%3A10158741" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/24:10158741 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.dovepress.com/resilience-in-rectal-cancer-treatment-lessons-from-the-covid-19-era-in-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRM" target="_blank" >https://www.dovepress.com/resilience-in-rectal-cancer-treatment-lessons-from-the-covid-19-era-in-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRM</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S455332" target="_blank" >10.2147/TCRM.S455332</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Introduction: The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018–2019). Results: A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The “surgery-adjuvant therapy” interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219). Conclusion: Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Introduction: The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018–2019). Results: A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The “surgery-adjuvant therapy” interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219). Conclusion: Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter “diagnosis-surgery” intervals.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30204 - Oncology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NU22-C-113" target="_blank" >NU22-C-113: Vliv pandemie COVID-19 na chirurgickou péči o pacienty se solidním nádorem zažívacího traktu v ČR</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
1178-203X
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
June
Stát vydavatele periodika
NZ - Nový Zéland
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
373-379
Kód UT WoS článku
001248758200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85197107212