Comparison of Apical Microleakage in Bioceramic and Resin-Based Endodontic Sealers with Conventional and Bioceramic Surface-Impregnated Gutta-Percha Points

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F25%3A10159352" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/25:10159352 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6131/8/2/65" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6131/8/2/65</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020065" target="_blank" >10.3390/ceramics8020065</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Apical Microleakage in Bioceramic and Resin-Based Endodontic Sealers with Conventional and Bioceramic Surface-Impregnated Gutta-Percha Points

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this study is to evaluate the apical sealing ability of novel bioceramic-based (BCB) and widely used resin-based (RB) root canal sealers in combination with traditional or bioceramic-coated gutta-percha points. A total of 92 human single-root extracted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into three groups (A, B, and C) of 30 samples based on the endodontic sealer/type of gutta-percha points/obturation method used. One tooth sample was used for the negative and positive controls (each). Group A: BCB sealer BioRoot RCS (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France)/bioceramic-impregnated gutta-percha TotalFill BC points (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland)/cold hydraulic single-cone. Group B: BioRoot RCS (Septodont, France)/traditional Protaper Gold Gutta-Percha Points (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA)/cold hydraulic single-cone. Group C: RB sealer AdSeal (Meta Biomed, Cheongju, Republic of Korea)/traditional Protaper Gold Gutta-Percha Points (Dentsply Sirona, USA)/warm vertical condensation. A dye penetration method was applied, and the length of apicocoronal penetration was measured using a surgical microscope. The data were statistically analyzed to evaluate differences at the 0.05 significance level. A significant difference was found between groups A and C, p = 0.0003, and groups B and C, p = 0.003. The data analysis proved that the BCB sealer using the cold hydraulic single-cone method ensured a substantially better seal than the RB sealer using the warm vertical condensation method. The choice of the type of gutta-percha points (bioceramic-coated or regular) appeared to be unimportant. No statistical significance was found between groups A and B, which indicates that using bioceramic-coated gutta-percha points does not bring any considerable benefit in view of a no-gap root canal obturation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Apical Microleakage in Bioceramic and Resin-Based Endodontic Sealers with Conventional and Bioceramic Surface-Impregnated Gutta-Percha Points

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this study is to evaluate the apical sealing ability of novel bioceramic-based (BCB) and widely used resin-based (RB) root canal sealers in combination with traditional or bioceramic-coated gutta-percha points. A total of 92 human single-root extracted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into three groups (A, B, and C) of 30 samples based on the endodontic sealer/type of gutta-percha points/obturation method used. One tooth sample was used for the negative and positive controls (each). Group A: BCB sealer BioRoot RCS (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France)/bioceramic-impregnated gutta-percha TotalFill BC points (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland)/cold hydraulic single-cone. Group B: BioRoot RCS (Septodont, France)/traditional Protaper Gold Gutta-Percha Points (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA)/cold hydraulic single-cone. Group C: RB sealer AdSeal (Meta Biomed, Cheongju, Republic of Korea)/traditional Protaper Gold Gutta-Percha Points (Dentsply Sirona, USA)/warm vertical condensation. A dye penetration method was applied, and the length of apicocoronal penetration was measured using a surgical microscope. The data were statistically analyzed to evaluate differences at the 0.05 significance level. A significant difference was found between groups A and C, p = 0.0003, and groups B and C, p = 0.003. The data analysis proved that the BCB sealer using the cold hydraulic single-cone method ensured a substantially better seal than the RB sealer using the warm vertical condensation method. The choice of the type of gutta-percha points (bioceramic-coated or regular) appeared to be unimportant. No statistical significance was found between groups A and B, which indicates that using bioceramic-coated gutta-percha points does not bring any considerable benefit in view of a no-gap root canal obturation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30208 - Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ceramics

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

2571-6131

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

65

Kód UT WoS článku

001514758800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105009081631