Threshold for diagnosing hypertension by automated office blood pressure using random sample population data

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F16%3A00065521" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/16:00065521 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/16:00093336 RIV/00023001:_____/16:00060075 RIV/00064190:_____/16:N0000055 RIV/00216208:11110/16:10327671

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001076" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001076</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001076" target="_blank" >10.1097/HJH.0000000000001076</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Threshold for diagnosing hypertension by automated office blood pressure using random sample population data

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

OBJECTIVE: Manual office blood pressure (BP) is still recommended for diagnosing hypertension. However, its predictive value is decreased by errors in measurement technique and the white-coat effect. The errors can be eliminated by automated office BP (AOBP) measurement taking multiple readings with the participant resting quietly alone. Therefore, use of AOBP in clinical practice requires a threshold value for hypertension diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to determine an AOBP threshold corresponding to the 140/90 mmHg manual office BP using data from a large random population sample. METHODS: In 2145 participants (mean age 47.3 +- 11.3 years) randomly selected from a Brno population aged 25-64 years, BP was measured using manual mercury and automated office sphygmomanometers. RESULTS: Manual SBP (mean difference 6.39 +- 9.76 mmHg) and DBP (mean difference 2.50 +- 6.54 mmHg) were higher than the automated BP. According to polynomial regression, automated systole of 131.06 (95% confidence interval 130.43-131.70) and diastole of 85.43 (95% confidence interval 85.03-85.82) corresponded to the manual BP of 140/90 mmHg. Using this cut-off, the white-coat hypertension was present in 24% of participants with elevated manual BP, whereas 10% had masked hypertension and 11% masked uncontrolled hypertension. In individuals with masked uncontrolled hypertension, only AOBP was associated with the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, whereas there was no association with manual BP. CONCLUSION: AOBP of 131/85 mmHg corresponds to the manual BP of 140/90 mmHg. This value may be used as a threshold for diagnosing hypertension using AOBP. However, outcome-driven studies are required to confirm this threshold.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Threshold for diagnosing hypertension by automated office blood pressure using random sample population data

Popis výsledku anglicky

OBJECTIVE: Manual office blood pressure (BP) is still recommended for diagnosing hypertension. However, its predictive value is decreased by errors in measurement technique and the white-coat effect. The errors can be eliminated by automated office BP (AOBP) measurement taking multiple readings with the participant resting quietly alone. Therefore, use of AOBP in clinical practice requires a threshold value for hypertension diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to determine an AOBP threshold corresponding to the 140/90 mmHg manual office BP using data from a large random population sample. METHODS: In 2145 participants (mean age 47.3 +- 11.3 years) randomly selected from a Brno population aged 25-64 years, BP was measured using manual mercury and automated office sphygmomanometers. RESULTS: Manual SBP (mean difference 6.39 +- 9.76 mmHg) and DBP (mean difference 2.50 +- 6.54 mmHg) were higher than the automated BP. According to polynomial regression, automated systole of 131.06 (95% confidence interval 130.43-131.70) and diastole of 85.43 (95% confidence interval 85.03-85.82) corresponded to the manual BP of 140/90 mmHg. Using this cut-off, the white-coat hypertension was present in 24% of participants with elevated manual BP, whereas 10% had masked hypertension and 11% masked uncontrolled hypertension. In individuals with masked uncontrolled hypertension, only AOBP was associated with the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, whereas there was no association with manual BP. CONCLUSION: AOBP of 131/85 mmHg corresponds to the manual BP of 140/90 mmHg. This value may be used as a threshold for diagnosing hypertension using AOBP. However, outcome-driven studies are required to confirm this threshold.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Hypertension

ISSN

0263-6352

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

34

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

2180-2186

Kód UT WoS článku

000385536600013

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—