Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F18%3A00068687" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/18:00068687 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104044 RIV/00843989:_____/18:E0107017
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895957/" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895957/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.007" target="_blank" >10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.007</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Coronary stent implantation has significantly improved percutaneous coronary intervention and enabled the management of early complications of plain balloon angioplasty. However, a new complication has accompanied these improvements: in-stent restenosis (ISR) arising from neointimal hyperplasia. ISR after coronary angioplasty is currently one of the main limitations of this method, leading to the recurrence of exertional angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes. The clinical incidence of ISR after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation is approximately 20%-35%. The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has led to a further decrease in the occurrence of ISR to 5%-10%. Evidence resulting from controlled clinical studies suggests that DES and drug-eluting balloon catheters (DEB) provide the best clinical and angiographic results in the treatment of ISR. We undertook a systematic review of the pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment options for BMS- and DES-ISR. We discuss recent randomised studies, comparing different DES or DEB used for BMS or DES-ISR treatment, as well as the use of new biovascular scafolds and the topic of scafold restenosis.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review
Popis výsledku anglicky
Coronary stent implantation has significantly improved percutaneous coronary intervention and enabled the management of early complications of plain balloon angioplasty. However, a new complication has accompanied these improvements: in-stent restenosis (ISR) arising from neointimal hyperplasia. ISR after coronary angioplasty is currently one of the main limitations of this method, leading to the recurrence of exertional angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes. The clinical incidence of ISR after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation is approximately 20%-35%. The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has led to a further decrease in the occurrence of ISR to 5%-10%. Evidence resulting from controlled clinical studies suggests that DES and drug-eluting balloon catheters (DEB) provide the best clinical and angiographic results in the treatment of ISR. We undertook a systematic review of the pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment options for BMS- and DES-ISR. We discuss recent randomised studies, comparing different DES or DEB used for BMS or DES-ISR treatment, as well as the use of new biovascular scafolds and the topic of scafold restenosis.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
ISSN
1671-5411
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CN - Čínská lidová republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
173-184
Kód UT WoS článku
000429624200007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—