Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F21%3A00075568" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/21:00075568 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00123478 RIV/61989592:15410/21:73614895

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/12/e052795" target="_blank" >https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/12/e052795</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052795" target="_blank" >10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052795</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction Perioperative care is a broad field covering an array of elective and emergency procedures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perioperative care exist with various degrees of methodological quality. We intend to critically appraise them using AGREE II instrument and investigate the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Methods and analysis We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PROSPERO and did not identify any similar systematic review in this area. We will search databases, repositories and websites of guideline developers and medical societies, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), DynaMed, the GIN international guideline library and registry of guidelines in development, BIGG international database of GRADE guidelines, ECRI Guideline Trust or National Institute for Clinical Evidence to identify all CPGs for perioperative care in an adult population in a general clinical setting. We will include CPGs, expert guidance, position papers, guidance documents and consensus statements published in the last 5 years by experts or international organisations that provide guidance or recommendations in the available full text with no geographical or language limitation. Excluded will be those containing only good practice statements. Two independent reviewers will perform critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. The data presented in a narrative and tabular form will include the results of the critical appraisal for all identified CPGs for all AGREE II domains and an assessment of the use of the GRADE approach. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate the findings through professional networks and conference presentations and will publish the results.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction Perioperative care is a broad field covering an array of elective and emergency procedures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perioperative care exist with various degrees of methodological quality. We intend to critically appraise them using AGREE II instrument and investigate the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Methods and analysis We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PROSPERO and did not identify any similar systematic review in this area. We will search databases, repositories and websites of guideline developers and medical societies, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), DynaMed, the GIN international guideline library and registry of guidelines in development, BIGG international database of GRADE guidelines, ECRI Guideline Trust or National Institute for Clinical Evidence to identify all CPGs for perioperative care in an adult population in a general clinical setting. We will include CPGs, expert guidance, position papers, guidance documents and consensus statements published in the last 5 years by experts or international organisations that provide guidance or recommendations in the available full text with no geographical or language limitation. Excluded will be those containing only good practice statements. Two independent reviewers will perform critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. The data presented in a narrative and tabular form will include the results of the critical appraisal for all identified CPGs for all AGREE II domains and an assessment of the use of the GRADE approach. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate the findings through professional networks and conference presentations and will publish the results.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30218 - General and internal medicine

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF19_073%2F0016943" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016943: Interní grantová agentura Masarykovy univerzity</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

BMJ OPEN

ISSN

2044-6055

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000730777400026

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—