Color Doppler ultrasound versus CT angiography for DIEP flap planning: A randomized controlled trial

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F23%3A00079461" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/23:00079461 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00132937 RIV/00209805:_____/23:00079393

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748681523004485" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748681523004485</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.042" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.042</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Color Doppler ultrasound versus CT angiography for DIEP flap planning: A randomized controlled trial

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Identifying relevant perforators is crucial in planning a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) has gained popularity for localizing perforators; however, current evidence on its efficiency is still inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of CDU with that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in localizing and selecting the relevant perforators.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction (uni- or bilateral) were randomly assigned to the CDU group (i.e., CDU was performed to map and select the relevant perforators preoperatively) or the CTA+CDU group (i.e., mapping was based on CTA and supplemented by CDU). CDU was performed by the same surgeon with a well-defined sonography experience from our previous study. The reference XY coordinates of the dissected perforators were measured intraoperatively, and deviations from preoperatively deducted coordinates were calculated (Delta CDU or Delta CTA+CDU). The flaps were categorized according to the number of dissected perforators, and adherence to the pre-operative strategy was evaluated.Results: Overall, 22 patients (30 flaps) in the CTA+CDU group and 27 (39 flaps) patients in the CDU group were evaluated. The average Delta CDU (0.6 cm) was significantly lower than the average Delta CTA+CDU (1.0 cm) (p &lt; 0.001). Adherence to the mapping-based dissection strategy was higher in the CDU group; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.092).Conclusion: CDU is not inferior to CTA + CDU in localizing and selecting relevant DIEA perforators. Therefore, CDU mapping is a possible complementary or substitute modality for CTA mapping.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Color Doppler ultrasound versus CT angiography for DIEP flap planning: A randomized controlled trial

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Identifying relevant perforators is crucial in planning a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) has gained popularity for localizing perforators; however, current evidence on its efficiency is still inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of CDU with that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in localizing and selecting the relevant perforators.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction (uni- or bilateral) were randomly assigned to the CDU group (i.e., CDU was performed to map and select the relevant perforators preoperatively) or the CTA+CDU group (i.e., mapping was based on CTA and supplemented by CDU). CDU was performed by the same surgeon with a well-defined sonography experience from our previous study. The reference XY coordinates of the dissected perforators were measured intraoperatively, and deviations from preoperatively deducted coordinates were calculated (Delta CDU or Delta CTA+CDU). The flaps were categorized according to the number of dissected perforators, and adherence to the pre-operative strategy was evaluated.Results: Overall, 22 patients (30 flaps) in the CTA+CDU group and 27 (39 flaps) patients in the CDU group were evaluated. The average Delta CDU (0.6 cm) was significantly lower than the average Delta CTA+CDU (1.0 cm) (p &lt; 0.001). Adherence to the mapping-based dissection strategy was higher in the CDU group; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.092).Conclusion: CDU is not inferior to CTA + CDU in localizing and selecting relevant DIEA perforators. Therefore, CDU mapping is a possible complementary or substitute modality for CTA mapping.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30212 - Surgery

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

ISSN

1748-6815

e-ISSN

1878-0539

Svazek periodika

86

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

NOV 2023

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

48-57

Kód UT WoS článku

001080047100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—