Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Comparison of volume measurements of mass standards at low pressures and in liquids

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00177016%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000032" target="_blank" >RIV/00177016:_____/22:N0000032 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef" target="_blank" >https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef" target="_blank" >10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Comparison of volume measurements of mass standards at low pressures and in liquids

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The determination of the volumes of mass standards is key to the precise determination of their masses, due to the effect of the air buoyancy force. The buoyancy force can either be reduced by mass determination at low pressure or enlarged for a determination of the apparent mass using a vessel filled with liquid. The standard method for the volume calibration of weights is comparison in liquid, as described in the document OIML R111. This report presents the results of calibrating the volumes of stainless-steel mass standards with a nominal mass of 1 kg at low pressure and in a liquid. The authors showed that both methods produced comparable results with maximum differences of 0.002 cm3 when adjusted for a standard temperature of 20 °C. The typical uncertainty in the volumes given by both methods is 0.002 cm3. A major source of uncertainty is the volume of the reference weight. The authors conclude that both methods produce consistent results, so that the method of volume calibration at low pressure can be used instead of hydrostatic weighing. The advantage of this approach is that both the masses and volumes of the weights are measured using the same mass comparator, which requires less manipulation. This study will help to establish the procedures for the dissemination and transfer of the mass unit from vacuum to ambient conditions in the institute of the author.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Comparison of volume measurements of mass standards at low pressures and in liquids

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The determination of the volumes of mass standards is key to the precise determination of their masses, due to the effect of the air buoyancy force. The buoyancy force can either be reduced by mass determination at low pressure or enlarged for a determination of the apparent mass using a vessel filled with liquid. The standard method for the volume calibration of weights is comparison in liquid, as described in the document OIML R111. This report presents the results of calibrating the volumes of stainless-steel mass standards with a nominal mass of 1 kg at low pressure and in a liquid. The authors showed that both methods produced comparable results with maximum differences of 0.002 cm3 when adjusted for a standard temperature of 20 °C. The typical uncertainty in the volumes given by both methods is 0.002 cm3. A major source of uncertainty is the volume of the reference weight. The authors conclude that both methods produce consistent results, so that the method of volume calibration at low pressure can be used instead of hydrostatic weighing. The advantage of this approach is that both the masses and volumes of the weights are measured using the same mass comparator, which requires less manipulation. This study will help to establish the procedures for the dissemination and transfer of the mass unit from vacuum to ambient conditions in the institute of the author.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20302 - Applied mechanics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Measurement Science and Technology

  • ISSN

    0957-0233

  • e-ISSN

    1361-6501

  • Svazek periodika

    33

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    6

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    064005

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000771181000001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus