In vitro comparison of efficacy of catheter locks in the treatment of catheter related blood stream infection
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F19%3A10398521" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/19:10398521 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11150/19:10398521
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=1cbaCYM-RG" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=1cbaCYM-RG</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.01.010" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.01.010</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
In vitro comparison of efficacy of catheter locks in the treatment of catheter related blood stream infection
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background & aims: Venous access used for parenteral nutrition (PN) application is extremely important for patients with intestinal failure. Potential loss of venous access might be a catastrophy for the patient. Catheter infections are a serious complication of PN application. Systemic administration of antibiotics as well as local antibiotic locks into the catheter to sterilize the catheter are used to treat catheter infections. However, there is no clear recommendation applying use of antibiotic locks, that would specify the type and concentration of antimicrobial medication. Our objective were to compare the efficacy of different types of antimicrobial lock therapy (especially taurolidine) and their concentrations to eradicate infectious agents. Methods: Bacterial strains of microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, Candida albicans) were used. Subsequently, the catheter was exposed to the microbes and then was incubated with a specific lock for 2 or 24 h at 37 degrees C. We used these locks: ethanol 70%, taurolidine, gentamicine in concentrations 0,5, 1 and 10 mg/ml and vancomycine in concentrations 1, 5, and 10 mg/ml. The number of remaining CFU (colony forming units) was compared after incubation. Results: 70% ethanol and taurolidine were most effective for all studied microorganisms. Gentamicine was more effective than vancomycine. Conclusions: The most effective antimicrobial lock solutions to eradicate selected pathogenic agents were ethanol and taurolidine. Use of antibiotics is often effective after many hours of treatment and there is a risk of inadequate therapy. (C) 2019 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Název v anglickém jazyce
In vitro comparison of efficacy of catheter locks in the treatment of catheter related blood stream infection
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background & aims: Venous access used for parenteral nutrition (PN) application is extremely important for patients with intestinal failure. Potential loss of venous access might be a catastrophy for the patient. Catheter infections are a serious complication of PN application. Systemic administration of antibiotics as well as local antibiotic locks into the catheter to sterilize the catheter are used to treat catheter infections. However, there is no clear recommendation applying use of antibiotic locks, that would specify the type and concentration of antimicrobial medication. Our objective were to compare the efficacy of different types of antimicrobial lock therapy (especially taurolidine) and their concentrations to eradicate infectious agents. Methods: Bacterial strains of microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, Candida albicans) were used. Subsequently, the catheter was exposed to the microbes and then was incubated with a specific lock for 2 or 24 h at 37 degrees C. We used these locks: ethanol 70%, taurolidine, gentamicine in concentrations 0,5, 1 and 10 mg/ml and vancomycine in concentrations 1, 5, and 10 mg/ml. The number of remaining CFU (colony forming units) was compared after incubation. Results: 70% ethanol and taurolidine were most effective for all studied microorganisms. Gentamicine was more effective than vancomycine. Conclusions: The most effective antimicrobial lock solutions to eradicate selected pathogenic agents were ethanol and taurolidine. Use of antibiotics is often effective after many hours of treatment and there is a risk of inadequate therapy. (C) 2019 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30308 - Nutrition, Dietetics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN [online]
ISSN
2405-4577
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
30
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
April
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
107-112
Kód UT WoS článku
000461813500015
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85061923417