Longitudinal outcomes following international multicentre experience with robotic aortic valve replacement

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F25%3A10496721" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/25:10496721 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/25:10496721 RIV/00064203:_____/25:10496721

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=WlCKl_CSrX" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=WlCKl_CSrX</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf103" target="_blank" >10.1093/ejcts/ezaf103</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Longitudinal outcomes following international multicentre experience with robotic aortic valve replacement

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to maintain the technical aspects of traditional prosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) while reducing invasiveness and facilitate options for concomitant operations, transaxillary lateral mini-thoracotomy endoscopic robotic-assisted aortic valve replacment (RAVR) has been introduced. The present data highlights the contemporary international collaborative experience. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing standardized RAVR across 10 international sites (1/2020-7/2024) were evaluated using a central database with 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analyzed with a median predicted risk of 1.6% with aortic stenosis in 85.7%, nearly half with bicuspid valves. Biological prostheses were implanted in 220 (73.3%) with a median valve size 23 mm, 10% receiving aortic root enlargement, with 17% of all patients undergoing concomitant procedures. Median cross-clamp 120 min with no conversions to sternotomy. Median length of stay was 5 days, 4.3% with prolonged ventilation, 1.7% renal failure, 1.0% stroke, 8.3% required re-thoracotomy for evacuation of haemothorax. There were two 30-day operative mortalities (0.7%). The new permanent pacemaker rate for the full cohort was 2.6%. Of 163 patients with complete 1-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up, mean aortic valve gradient was 10 mmHg and all but two patients (1.2%) had trace to no prosthetic or paravalvular insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: RAVR is safe and effective, providing the reproducible benefits of surgical AVR while affording a less invasive approach that permits the opportunity for concomitant procedures. For low and intermediate risk patients with aortic valve disease, RAVR is a potential reproducible alternative for patients and heart teams.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Longitudinal outcomes following international multicentre experience with robotic aortic valve replacement

Popis výsledku anglicky

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to maintain the technical aspects of traditional prosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) while reducing invasiveness and facilitate options for concomitant operations, transaxillary lateral mini-thoracotomy endoscopic robotic-assisted aortic valve replacment (RAVR) has been introduced. The present data highlights the contemporary international collaborative experience. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing standardized RAVR across 10 international sites (1/2020-7/2024) were evaluated using a central database with 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analyzed with a median predicted risk of 1.6% with aortic stenosis in 85.7%, nearly half with bicuspid valves. Biological prostheses were implanted in 220 (73.3%) with a median valve size 23 mm, 10% receiving aortic root enlargement, with 17% of all patients undergoing concomitant procedures. Median cross-clamp 120 min with no conversions to sternotomy. Median length of stay was 5 days, 4.3% with prolonged ventilation, 1.7% renal failure, 1.0% stroke, 8.3% required re-thoracotomy for evacuation of haemothorax. There were two 30-day operative mortalities (0.7%). The new permanent pacemaker rate for the full cohort was 2.6%. Of 163 patients with complete 1-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up, mean aortic valve gradient was 10 mmHg and all but two patients (1.2%) had trace to no prosthetic or paravalvular insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: RAVR is safe and effective, providing the reproducible benefits of surgical AVR while affording a less invasive approach that permits the opportunity for concomitant procedures. For low and intermediate risk patients with aortic valve disease, RAVR is a potential reproducible alternative for patients and heart teams.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

ISSN

1010-7940

e-ISSN

1873-734X

Svazek periodika

67

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

ezaf103

Kód UT WoS článku

001472681200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105003746045