Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous cannulation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: prospective randomized trial

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F25%3A10501743" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/25:10501743 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/44555601:13450/25:43899274 RIV/00216208:11120/25:43928806 RIV/00216208:11150/25:10501743

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ogGl_Mbx9Z" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ogGl_Mbx9Z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait/208286" target="_blank" >10.5114/ait/208286</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous cannulation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: prospective randomized trial

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion is a common intervention, conventionally performed using visualization and palpation techniques. It has been reported that the first attempt success rate can be as low as 51%. Ultrasound guidance improves the overall success rate and the success rate of the first attempt. Therefore, we performed a randomized, prospective, clinical trial to compare two different techniques of PVC insertion in the setting of an operating theatre with a focus on the first attempt success rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This clinical trial allocated patients scheduled for elective surgery in general anaesthesia to undergo PVC cannulation with ultrasound guidance (Group A) or to undergo PVC cannulation without the use of ultrasound (Group B). RESULTS: A total of 613 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first cannulation attempt was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (Group A: 90.6%, Group B: 84.5%, P = 0.039). The overall success rate in both groups was 100%. The time needed to perform PVC cannulation was significantly lower in Group B than Group A (Group A: 406 +- 200 s, Group B: 301 +- 215 s, P &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that ultrasound-guided PVC cannulation was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate than the conventional technique.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous cannulation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: prospective randomized trial

Popis výsledku anglicky

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion is a common intervention, conventionally performed using visualization and palpation techniques. It has been reported that the first attempt success rate can be as low as 51%. Ultrasound guidance improves the overall success rate and the success rate of the first attempt. Therefore, we performed a randomized, prospective, clinical trial to compare two different techniques of PVC insertion in the setting of an operating theatre with a focus on the first attempt success rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This clinical trial allocated patients scheduled for elective surgery in general anaesthesia to undergo PVC cannulation with ultrasound guidance (Group A) or to undergo PVC cannulation without the use of ultrasound (Group B). RESULTS: A total of 613 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first cannulation attempt was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (Group A: 90.6%, Group B: 84.5%, P = 0.039). The overall success rate in both groups was 100%. The time needed to perform PVC cannulation was significantly lower in Group B than Group A (Group A: 406 +- 200 s, Group B: 301 +- 215 s, P &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that ultrasound-guided PVC cannulation was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate than the conventional technique.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30223 - Anaesthesiology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy

ISSN

1642-5758

e-ISSN

1731-2531

Svazek periodika

57

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

219-225

Kód UT WoS článku

001561223000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105015124914