Intercenter Variability in the Application of Biopsy-based Transcriptomics in Kidney Transplantation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F25%3A10503157" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/25:10503157 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00023001:_____/25:00085845 RIV/00216208:11130/25:10503157 RIV/00098892:_____/25:10159443 RIV/00843989:_____/25:E0111908 a 2 dalších

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=13CCE.Vue-" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=13CCE.Vue-</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001848" target="_blank" >10.1097/TXD.0000000000001848</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Intercenter Variability in the Application of Biopsy-based Transcriptomics in Kidney Transplantation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background.Biopsy-based transcriptomics (BBT) was implemented in Central Europe in 2022 to improve kidney transplant diagnostics. Differences in diagnostic practices across transplant centers remain underexplored.Methods.This retrospective multicenter study analyzed 474 kidney graft biopsies from 10 transplant centers between August 2022 and May 2024, where, besides routine histology, BBT using the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) was performed. Differences in BBT indications and discrepancies between histology assessment by Banff 2022 and MMDx sign-outs among transplant centers were evaluated.Results.Most centers used BBT in only 12%-31% of all performed biopsies, relying on histology alone for most diagnostic decisions. BBT indications varied across centers: 3 focused on histological no-rejection with clinical discrepancy (44%, 45%, and 70%), 2 on chronic or chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR; clinical discrepancy 44% and 48%), and 2 on borderline changes (clinical discrepancy 30% and 33%). BBT showed moderate agreement with histology (kappa = 0.49), with similar discrepancy rates between high- and low-volume centers. Molecular AMR was found in 44% of probable AMR, 63% of active AMR, 63% of microvascular inflammation, C4d- and donor-specific antibody (DSA)-, 77% of chronic-active AMR, and 21% chronic AMR. Molecular T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) was confirmed in 26% of histologically active TCMR, in 9% of chronic TCMR, and in 16% of borderline changes. In histologic no-rejection cases, molecular AMR was present in 10% of DSA- and 34% of DSA+ biopsies.Conclusions.A moderate discrepancy between histology and MMDx sign-outs was found regardless of the center volume. BBT indications notably varied among centers. Standardized indications should be defined to improve the integration of molecular diagnostics into routine care.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Intercenter Variability in the Application of Biopsy-based Transcriptomics in Kidney Transplantation

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background.Biopsy-based transcriptomics (BBT) was implemented in Central Europe in 2022 to improve kidney transplant diagnostics. Differences in diagnostic practices across transplant centers remain underexplored.Methods.This retrospective multicenter study analyzed 474 kidney graft biopsies from 10 transplant centers between August 2022 and May 2024, where, besides routine histology, BBT using the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) was performed. Differences in BBT indications and discrepancies between histology assessment by Banff 2022 and MMDx sign-outs among transplant centers were evaluated.Results.Most centers used BBT in only 12%-31% of all performed biopsies, relying on histology alone for most diagnostic decisions. BBT indications varied across centers: 3 focused on histological no-rejection with clinical discrepancy (44%, 45%, and 70%), 2 on chronic or chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR; clinical discrepancy 44% and 48%), and 2 on borderline changes (clinical discrepancy 30% and 33%). BBT showed moderate agreement with histology (kappa = 0.49), with similar discrepancy rates between high- and low-volume centers. Molecular AMR was found in 44% of probable AMR, 63% of active AMR, 63% of microvascular inflammation, C4d- and donor-specific antibody (DSA)-, 77% of chronic-active AMR, and 21% chronic AMR. Molecular T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) was confirmed in 26% of histologically active TCMR, in 9% of chronic TCMR, and in 16% of borderline changes. In histologic no-rejection cases, molecular AMR was present in 10% of DSA- and 34% of DSA+ biopsies.Conclusions.A moderate discrepancy between histology and MMDx sign-outs was found regardless of the center volume. BBT indications notably varied among centers. Standardized indications should be defined to improve the integration of molecular diagnostics into routine care.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30217 - Urology and nephrology

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Transplantation Direct

ISSN

2373-8731

e-ISSN

2373-8731

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

e1848

Kód UT WoS článku

001573679800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105026617430