Biobanking Across Europe Post-GDPR: A Deliberately Fragmented Landscape
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00209805%3A_____%2F21%3A00080609" target="_blank" >RIV/00209805:_____/21:00080609 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Biobanking Across Europe Post-GDPR: A Deliberately Fragmented Landscape
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter seeks to provide insight into the ways in which Member States leveraged the regulatory discretion afforded to them by the GDPR. Specifically, it reviews the biobank regulatory environment; whether and how derogations under Article 89(2) GDPR are enabled; the legal basis for scientific research and the role of consent in biobanking post-GDPR; the balance between individual rights and public interest in national law; and finally, the GDPR's impact and future possibilities for biobanking. In exercising self-determination, Member States can, to a certain extent, align data protection requirements with their values and aspirations. Such alignment, though, could jeopardize collaborative research. In light of the need to bridge divergent legal and ethical requirements at a national and supranational level, the role of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) might prove to be essential.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Biobanking Across Europe Post-GDPR: A Deliberately Fragmented Landscape
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter seeks to provide insight into the ways in which Member States leveraged the regulatory discretion afforded to them by the GDPR. Specifically, it reviews the biobank regulatory environment; whether and how derogations under Article 89(2) GDPR are enabled; the legal basis for scientific research and the role of consent in biobanking post-GDPR; the balance between individual rights and public interest in national law; and finally, the GDPR's impact and future possibilities for biobanking. In exercising self-determination, Member States can, to a certain extent, align data protection requirements with their values and aspirations. Such alignment, though, could jeopardize collaborative research. In light of the need to bridge divergent legal and ethical requirements at a national and supranational level, the role of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) might prove to be essential.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
GDPR and Biobanking
ISBN
978-3-030-49388-2
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
1-23
Počet stran knihy
432
Název nakladatele
Springer
Místo vydání
Cham
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—