Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

ProstaPilot: A Comparative Study of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00209805%3A_____%2F25%3A00080260" target="_blank" >RIV/00209805:_____/25:00080260 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325001041" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325001041</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.016" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.016</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    ProstaPilot: A Comparative Study of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) between biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening pathways in the Czech population, which has a high prevalence of opportunistic PSA testing (45% in the target age group). METHODS: Between May 2022 and May 2023, 423 men aged 50-69 yr who were enrolled via volunteer-based recruitment, underwent both PSA testing and bpMRI of the prostate. Positive results were defined as PSA GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO3 μg/l or a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of 4-5. Those with positive tests were referred for further evaluation, including an MRI-targeted biopsy and a systematic 12-core biopsy. csPC was defined as any cancer of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO2. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 423 men, 35 (8.3%) had at least one positive screening test. The PSA-based pathway identified 25 men (5.9%), whereas the MRI-based pathway identified 16 (3.8%) with suspicion of PC, with potential to reduce the number of biopsies required by 36%. Subsequent biopsy revealed PC in seven men (1.7%) with a positive PSA test and 14 men (3.3%) with positive MRI findings. Nonsignificant PC and csPC rates were 1.0% (n = 4) and 0.7% (n = 3) for the PSA pathway, and 1.7% and 1.7% (n = 7) for the MRI pathway, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In a highly prescreened population, bpMRI may increase the csPC detection rate while reducing the number of biopsies needed in comparison to PSA-based diagnosis. However, bpMRI may also slightly increase the detection of grade group 1 cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared a blood test for PSA (prostate-specific antigen) and an MRI scan (magnetic resonance imaging) for detection of prostate cancer in men aged 50-69 years. We found that MRI scans may reduce the number of biopsies that need to be performed for cancer diagnosis while increasing the detection rate for cancers that are significant.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    ProstaPilot: A Comparative Study of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) between biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening pathways in the Czech population, which has a high prevalence of opportunistic PSA testing (45% in the target age group). METHODS: Between May 2022 and May 2023, 423 men aged 50-69 yr who were enrolled via volunteer-based recruitment, underwent both PSA testing and bpMRI of the prostate. Positive results were defined as PSA GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO3 μg/l or a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of 4-5. Those with positive tests were referred for further evaluation, including an MRI-targeted biopsy and a systematic 12-core biopsy. csPC was defined as any cancer of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO2. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 423 men, 35 (8.3%) had at least one positive screening test. The PSA-based pathway identified 25 men (5.9%), whereas the MRI-based pathway identified 16 (3.8%) with suspicion of PC, with potential to reduce the number of biopsies required by 36%. Subsequent biopsy revealed PC in seven men (1.7%) with a positive PSA test and 14 men (3.3%) with positive MRI findings. Nonsignificant PC and csPC rates were 1.0% (n = 4) and 0.7% (n = 3) for the PSA pathway, and 1.7% and 1.7% (n = 7) for the MRI pathway, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In a highly prescreened population, bpMRI may increase the csPC detection rate while reducing the number of biopsies needed in comparison to PSA-based diagnosis. However, bpMRI may also slightly increase the detection of grade group 1 cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared a blood test for PSA (prostate-specific antigen) and an MRI scan (magnetic resonance imaging) for detection of prostate cancer in men aged 50-69 years. We found that MRI scans may reduce the number of biopsies that need to be performed for cancer diagnosis while increasing the detection rate for cancers that are significant.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30204 - Oncology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/NU22-09-00539" target="_blank" >NU22-09-00539: ProstaPilot. Screening karcinomu prostaty pomocí magnetické rezonance se zkráceným protokolem</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    European urology open science

  • ISSN

    2666-1683

  • e-ISSN

    2666-1683

  • Svazek periodika

    76

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    June 2025

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    7-13

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001477738200001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105003112819