Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F12%3A12450" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/12:12450 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064165:_____/12:12450

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01338.x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01338.x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We investigated the frequency of pathology, especially intrauterine adhesions, after instrumental evacuation within 24 h of delivery in a prospective observational intervention study on 100 women where a see and treat hysteroscopy was performed after three to four months. There were two possible etiology groups: intrauterine adhesions [classified according by European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) grades IIV] and residual tissue (classified as minimal and considerable). Adhesions were found in 18% of patients, as follows: ESGE III in 13% and ESGE IIIIV in 5%. Residual tissue was present in 33%, as follows: minimal in 23% and considerable in 10%. There were 6% who had both mild adhesions and minimal residual tissue, while 43% of the womenhad normal intrauterine findings. Of the women, 32% were symptomatic (spotting, bleeding). Only residual tissue correlated with symptoms (r=0.376; p<0.001). There is a high prevalence of acquired intrauterine pathology (57%) in women who

Název v anglickém jazyce

Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery?

Popis výsledku anglicky

We investigated the frequency of pathology, especially intrauterine adhesions, after instrumental evacuation within 24 h of delivery in a prospective observational intervention study on 100 women where a see and treat hysteroscopy was performed after three to four months. There were two possible etiology groups: intrauterine adhesions [classified according by European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) grades IIV] and residual tissue (classified as minimal and considerable). Adhesions were found in 18% of patients, as follows: ESGE III in 13% and ESGE IIIIV in 5%. Residual tissue was present in 33%, as follows: minimal in 23% and considerable in 10%. There were 6% who had both mild adhesions and minimal residual tissue, while 43% of the womenhad normal intrauterine findings. Of the women, 32% were symptomatic (spotting, bleeding). Only residual tissue correlated with symptoms (r=0.376; p<0.001). There is a high prevalence of acquired intrauterine pathology (57%) in women who

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NS10576" target="_blank" >NS10576: Diagnostika a terapie intrauterinních patologií spojených s těhotenstvím</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

ISSN

0001-6349

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

91

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

DK - Dánské království

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

514-517

Kód UT WoS článku

000301712700017

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—