A multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal mesh in the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F12%3A12660" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/12:12660 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/12:8115 RIV/00216208:11120/12:43906468 RIV/61384399:31140/12:00040264 RIV/00064203:_____/12:8115 a 4 dalších

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.016</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal mesh in the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare recurrence and complication rates for sacrospinous fixation (SSF) and prolene mesh techniques for the primary treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing surgery for vault prolapse were included in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study comparing SSF or total mesh (Prolift; Gynecare/Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). The examination included pelvic organ prolapse quantification, urodynamics, ultrasound, and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires before and 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 168 randomized patients, 83 underwent SSF and 85 mesh repair. Prolapse recurrence after 12 months occurred in 39.4% of the SSF group and in 16.9% of the mesh group (P= .003). The mesh exposure rate was 20.8%. No difference in QoL improvement as well as of de novo stress urinary incontinence and overactive bladder onset was found. CONCLUSION: Mesh exposure occurrence was balanced against a lower prolap

Název v anglickém jazyce

A multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal mesh in the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse

Popis výsledku anglicky

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare recurrence and complication rates for sacrospinous fixation (SSF) and prolene mesh techniques for the primary treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing surgery for vault prolapse were included in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study comparing SSF or total mesh (Prolift; Gynecare/Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). The examination included pelvic organ prolapse quantification, urodynamics, ultrasound, and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires before and 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 168 randomized patients, 83 underwent SSF and 85 mesh repair. Prolapse recurrence after 12 months occurred in 39.4% of the SSF group and in 16.9% of the mesh group (P= .003). The mesh exposure rate was 20.8%. No difference in QoL improvement as well as of de novo stress urinary incontinence and overactive bladder onset was found. CONCLUSION: Mesh exposure occurrence was balanced against a lower prolap

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NS10453" target="_blank" >NS10453: Chirurgická léčba inkontinence moči u dlouhodobě hospitalizovaných geriatrických pacientů; srovnávací multicentrická randomizovaná studie výsledků různých metod</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

ISSN

0002-9378

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

207

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

"e1"-"e7"

Kód UT WoS článku

000310212000028

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—