Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F13%3A10191113" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/13:10191113 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/47813059:19510/13:#0000276
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718581/" target="_blank" >http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718581/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether pacing or sensing configuration has an effect on pacing parameters or their time progression. Three left ventricular (LV) pacing parameters were monitored - the LV pacing threshold, pacing impedance and intrinsic R-wave amplitude. METHODS: Data were collected at three intervals: during implantation; between the second and fifth month after implantation (first follow-up); and between the eighth and 15th month after implantation (second follow-up). Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The impedance, but not its time progression, was significantly higher for the LV tip to LV ring configuration than for other configurations. R-wave amplitude and impedance increased significantly (without dependance on configurations) between implantation and first follow-up, as expected. The time progression of any parameter was not dependent on configuration of the LV lead. CONCLUSIONS: LV tip to LV ring is the best configuration for maint
Název v anglickém jazyce
Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration
Popis výsledku anglicky
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether pacing or sensing configuration has an effect on pacing parameters or their time progression. Three left ventricular (LV) pacing parameters were monitored - the LV pacing threshold, pacing impedance and intrinsic R-wave amplitude. METHODS: Data were collected at three intervals: during implantation; between the second and fifth month after implantation (first follow-up); and between the eighth and 15th month after implantation (second follow-up). Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The impedance, but not its time progression, was significantly higher for the LV tip to LV ring configuration than for other configurations. R-wave amplitude and impedance increased significantly (without dependance on configurations) between implantation and first follow-up, as expected. The time progression of any parameter was not dependent on configuration of the LV lead. CONCLUSIONS: LV tip to LV ring is the best configuration for maint
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FP - Ostatní lékařské obory
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Experimental and Clinical Cardiology
ISSN
1205-6626
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CA - Kanada
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
85-88
Kód UT WoS článku
000322439400016
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—