Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10190450" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10190450 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11140/14:10190450 RIV/49777513:23520/14:43920348 RIV/00669806:_____/14:10190450 RIV/00064165:_____/14:10190450

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.ijgo.org/article/S0020-7292%2813%2900490-6/fulltext" target="_blank" >http://www.ijgo.org/article/S0020-7292%2813%2900490-6/fulltext</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.011</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and extent of vaginal and perineal trauma among primiparous women after mediolateral and lateral episiotomy. Methods: In a prospective randomized study at University Hospital Pilsen, Czech Republic, 790 consecutive primiparous women were enrolled between April 2010 and April 2012. Mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) followed an angle of at least 60o fromthemidline. Lateral episiotomy(LE) started 1-2 cm laterally from the midline and was directed toward the ischial tuberosity. A rectal examination was performed before episiotomy repair. Results: MLE was performed for 390 women, and LE for 400. The groups did not differ in maternal or neonatal characteristics. No difference was found in incidence or extent of vaginal and perineal trauma; or in additional perineal (1.8% vs 1.5%, P = 0.6) or vaginal (8.5% vs 10.6%, P = 0.2) trauma continuing along the episiotomy incision. The incidence of anal sphincter injury did not differ between MLE and LE (1.5% vs 1.3%,

Název v anglickém jazyce

Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and extent of vaginal and perineal trauma among primiparous women after mediolateral and lateral episiotomy. Methods: In a prospective randomized study at University Hospital Pilsen, Czech Republic, 790 consecutive primiparous women were enrolled between April 2010 and April 2012. Mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) followed an angle of at least 60o fromthemidline. Lateral episiotomy(LE) started 1-2 cm laterally from the midline and was directed toward the ischial tuberosity. A rectal examination was performed before episiotomy repair. Results: MLE was performed for 390 women, and LE for 400. The groups did not differ in maternal or neonatal characteristics. No difference was found in incidence or extent of vaginal and perineal trauma; or in additional perineal (1.8% vs 1.5%, P = 0.6) or vaginal (8.5% vs 10.6%, P = 0.2) trauma continuing along the episiotomy incision. The incidence of anal sphincter injury did not differ between MLE and LE (1.5% vs 1.3%,

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0090" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0090: NTIS - Nové technologie pro informační společnost</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

ISSN

0020-7292

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

124

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

72-76

Kód UT WoS článku

000330086100017

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—