Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted versus Minimally Invasive Nonendoscopic Thyroidectomy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10281717" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10281717 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21230/14:00218204 RIV/00216208:11120/14:43908446 RIV/00064203:_____/14:10281717
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/450170" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/450170</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/450170" target="_blank" >10.1155/2014/450170</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted versus Minimally Invasive Nonendoscopic Thyroidectomy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy (MINET) represent well accepted and reproducible techniques developed with the main goal to improve cosmetic outcome, accelerate healing, and increase patient's comfort following thyroid surgery. Between 2007 and 2011, a prospective nonrandomized study of patients undergoing minimally invasive thyroid surgery was performed to compare advantages and disadvantages of the two different techniques. There were no significant differences in the length of incision to perform surgical procedures. Mean duration of hemithyroidectomy was comparable in both groups, but it was more time consuming to perform total thyroidectomy by MIVAT. There were more patients undergoing MIVAT procedures without active drainage in the postoperative course and we also could see a trend for less pain in the same group. This was paralleled by statistically significant decreased administration of both opiates and
Název v anglickém jazyce
Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted versus Minimally Invasive Nonendoscopic Thyroidectomy
Popis výsledku anglicky
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy (MINET) represent well accepted and reproducible techniques developed with the main goal to improve cosmetic outcome, accelerate healing, and increase patient's comfort following thyroid surgery. Between 2007 and 2011, a prospective nonrandomized study of patients undergoing minimally invasive thyroid surgery was performed to compare advantages and disadvantages of the two different techniques. There were no significant differences in the length of incision to perform surgical procedures. Mean duration of hemithyroidectomy was comparable in both groups, but it was more time consuming to perform total thyroidectomy by MIVAT. There were more patients undergoing MIVAT procedures without active drainage in the postoperative course and we also could see a trend for less pain in the same group. This was paralleled by statistically significant decreased administration of both opiates and
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
BioMed Research International
ISSN
2314-6133
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
neuveden
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2014
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000334770300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—