Centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10282304" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10282304 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064211:_____/14:#0000415 RIV/00216208:11120/14:43908534 RIV/00064173:_____/14:#0000468

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-178" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-178</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-178" target="_blank" >10.1186/1477-7819-12-178</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraftdevice (Cytori Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. We compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration. Methods: Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months. To measure the subjective outcome, we distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients bo

Název v anglickém jazyce

Centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraftdevice (Cytori Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. We compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration. Methods: Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months. To measure the subjective outcome, we distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients bo

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT11382" target="_blank" >NT11382: Ověření možností využití vybraných hydrogelů jako osmotických tkáňových expandérů a tkáňových výplní v rekonstrukční chirurgii</a><br>

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN

1477-7819

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

12

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Jun

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000338246600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—