Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10285207" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10285207 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064165:_____/14:10285207

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074023/pdf/ijwh-6-623.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074023/pdf/ijwh-6-623.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S43591" target="_blank" >10.2147/IJWH.S43591</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure with large symptomatic potential in treatment of women with uterine leiomyomas. Due to specificities of this method and possible complications the appropriate indication is crucial. Patient' symptoms, age, plans for pregnancy, and surgical and reproductive history play a major role in decision-making regarding appropriate subjects for UAE. Close cooperation between the gynecologist and the interventional radiologist is necessary. UAE isusually offered as an alternative to surgical treatment. In patients with no fertility plans, it is a less invasive option than abdominal hysterectomy, with a comparable effect on fibroid-related symptoms and quality of life. The need for reinterventionis markedly greater in patients after UAE (up to 35% within 5 years) than after hysterectomy. Women with large symptomatic fibroids wishing to retain the uterus and ineligible for minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy

Název v anglickém jazyce

Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons

Popis výsledku anglicky

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure with large symptomatic potential in treatment of women with uterine leiomyomas. Due to specificities of this method and possible complications the appropriate indication is crucial. Patient' symptoms, age, plans for pregnancy, and surgical and reproductive history play a major role in decision-making regarding appropriate subjects for UAE. Close cooperation between the gynecologist and the interventional radiologist is necessary. UAE isusually offered as an alternative to surgical treatment. In patients with no fertility plans, it is a less invasive option than abdominal hysterectomy, with a comparable effect on fibroid-related symptoms and quality of life. The need for reinterventionis markedly greater in patients after UAE (up to 35% within 5 years) than after hysterectomy. Women with large symptomatic fibroids wishing to retain the uterus and ineligible for minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Women's Health

ISSN

1179-1411

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

623-629

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—