Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10285459" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10285459 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67985807:_____/14:00429351 RIV/00064165:_____/14:10285459

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/63/63_S309.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/63/63_S309.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim was to compare methods of body fat measurement in different BMI groups. An additional aim was to discuss differences reflecting the structural and functional changes of fat tissue. The study group included 130 adult Caucasian women stratified bybody mass index (BMI): 18-24.99 (n=30), 25-29.99 (n=26), 30-34.99 (n=33), 35-39.99 (n=30), and BMI }= 40 (n=11). Bioelectrical impedance was performed using Tanita TBF 410 GS, Bodystat 1500, and Omron BF 300. A caliper type Best was also applied. Correspondence of four methods with DEXA was assessed using the Bland-Altman and ANOVA analyses. Measurements by BIA were not significantly different from DEXA up to BMI of 30, but DEXA significantly overestimated in the higher BMI subgroup by all three methods. Caliper measurement significantly underestimated DEXA in all BMI subgroups. BIA methods overestimated DEXA for the obese subjects. Tanita did statistically the best. The Caliper test appeared less preferable than the BIA methods, especi

Název v anglickém jazyce

Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim was to compare methods of body fat measurement in different BMI groups. An additional aim was to discuss differences reflecting the structural and functional changes of fat tissue. The study group included 130 adult Caucasian women stratified bybody mass index (BMI): 18-24.99 (n=30), 25-29.99 (n=26), 30-34.99 (n=33), 35-39.99 (n=30), and BMI }= 40 (n=11). Bioelectrical impedance was performed using Tanita TBF 410 GS, Bodystat 1500, and Omron BF 300. A caliper type Best was also applied. Correspondence of four methods with DEXA was assessed using the Bland-Altman and ANOVA analyses. Measurements by BIA were not significantly different from DEXA up to BMI of 30, but DEXA significantly overestimated in the higher BMI subgroup by all three methods. Caliper measurement significantly underestimated DEXA in all BMI subgroups. BIA methods overestimated DEXA for the obese subjects. Tanita did statistically the best. The Caliper test appeared less preferable than the BIA methods, especi

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FB - Endokrinologie, diabetologie, metabolismus, výživa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT14182" target="_blank" >NT14182: Ftaláty a estrogenní endokrinní disruptory ve vztahu k metabolickým onemocněním</a><br>

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Physiological Research

ISSN

0862-8408

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

63

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Suppl. 2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

"S309"-"S320"

Kód UT WoS článku

000345590400008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—