Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): A comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10286371" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10286371 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00064165:_____/14:10286371
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.04.017" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.04.017</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.04.017" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.04.017</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): A comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objective: To evaluate feasibility of unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children to prevent pyelonephritis and second anaesthesia. Patients and methods: During 2006-2013, 70 children (1-5 years old) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for high grade hydronephrosis. Unstented repair was indicated in 34 children (GroupL1), double-J stent was placed in 21 patients (Group L2) and uretero-pyelostomy stent (Cook) in 15 patients (Group L3). Stenting was preferred in large thin-walled pelvis, thin ureter, kidney malrotation, and unfavourable course of crossing vessels. The outcome was compared with age-matched group of 52 children who had open surgery during 1996-2006 (Groups O1, O3). Results: Operation times were significantly shorter in Groups L1 and L2 than in Group L3; the times were shorter in open repairs. Three patients with crossing vessels from Group L1 had urine leakage and one had obstruction (11.4%). In Group L2, one patient had obstruction, one incorrect placement of the
Název v anglickém jazyce
Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): A comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objective: To evaluate feasibility of unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children to prevent pyelonephritis and second anaesthesia. Patients and methods: During 2006-2013, 70 children (1-5 years old) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for high grade hydronephrosis. Unstented repair was indicated in 34 children (GroupL1), double-J stent was placed in 21 patients (Group L2) and uretero-pyelostomy stent (Cook) in 15 patients (Group L3). Stenting was preferred in large thin-walled pelvis, thin ureter, kidney malrotation, and unfavourable course of crossing vessels. The outcome was compared with age-matched group of 52 children who had open surgery during 1996-2006 (Groups O1, O3). Results: Operation times were significantly shorter in Groups L1 and L2 than in Group L3; the times were shorter in open repairs. Three patients with crossing vessels from Group L1 had urine leakage and one had obstruction (11.4%). In Group L2, one patient had obstruction, one incorrect placement of the
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Pediatric Urology
ISSN
1477-5131
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1153-1159
Kód UT WoS článku
000346364600033
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—