History of femoral head fracture and coronal fracture of the femoral condyles
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F15%3A10295606" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/15:10295606 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61383082:_____/15:#0000353
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2730-x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2730-x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2730-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00264-015-2730-x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
History of femoral head fracture and coronal fracture of the femoral condyles
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The first known description of the coronal fracture of the lateral femoral condyle was published by Busch in 1869. Hoffa used Busch's drawing in the first edition of his book in 1888 and accompanied it only with one sentence. A full case history of thisfracture pattern was described by Braun in 1891. However, Braun's article fell into oblivion and so the fracture was popularized only in the fourth edition of Hoffa's textbook, particularly thanks to the drawing, rather than the brief description. Therefore, a fracture of the posterior femoral condyle, or more specifically, of the lateral condyle, could properly be called "Busch-Hoffa fracture". Femoral head fracture was initially described by Birkett in 1869. Of essential importance in this respect were the publications by Christopher in 1924 and, particularly, Pipkin's study of 1957, including his classification that is still in use today. A historically correct eponym for a femoral head fracture would therefore be "Birkitt-Pipkin fra
Název v anglickém jazyce
History of femoral head fracture and coronal fracture of the femoral condyles
Popis výsledku anglicky
The first known description of the coronal fracture of the lateral femoral condyle was published by Busch in 1869. Hoffa used Busch's drawing in the first edition of his book in 1888 and accompanied it only with one sentence. A full case history of thisfracture pattern was described by Braun in 1891. However, Braun's article fell into oblivion and so the fracture was popularized only in the fourth edition of Hoffa's textbook, particularly thanks to the drawing, rather than the brief description. Therefore, a fracture of the posterior femoral condyle, or more specifically, of the lateral condyle, could properly be called "Busch-Hoffa fracture". Femoral head fracture was initially described by Birkett in 1869. Of essential importance in this respect were the publications by Christopher in 1924 and, particularly, Pipkin's study of 1957, including his classification that is still in use today. A historically correct eponym for a femoral head fracture would therefore be "Birkitt-Pipkin fra
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FI - Traumatologie a ortopedie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Orthopaedics
ISSN
0341-2695
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
39
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
1245-1250
Kód UT WoS článku
000355755600029
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84930482314