Fomepizole versus ethanol in the treatment of acute methanol poisoning: Comparison of clinical effectiveness in a mass poisoning outbreak
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F15%3A10297918" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/15:10297918 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00064165:_____/15:10297918 RIV/61388955:_____/15:00467500
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1059946" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1059946</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1059946" target="_blank" >10.3109/15563650.2015.1059946</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Fomepizole versus ethanol in the treatment of acute methanol poisoning: Comparison of clinical effectiveness in a mass poisoning outbreak
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Context. Mass or cluster methanol poisonings are frequently reported from around the world. The comparative effectiveness of ethanol and fomepizole as antidotes for methanol poisoning is unknown due to the difficulty of performing a randomized controlledtrial. Objective. During an outbreak of mass poisonings in the Czech Republic in 2012-2014, we compared the effects of antidotes on the frequency of health sequelae and mortality. Methods. The study was designed as a cross-sectional case series and quasi-case-control study. Patients with a diagnosis of methanol poisoning on admission to hospitals were identified for the study. Diagnosis was established when (i) a history of recent ingestion of illicit spirits was available and serum methanol was higherthan 6.2 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), or (ii) there was a history/clinical suspicion of methanol poisoning, and serum methanol was above the limit of detection with at least two of the following: pH < 7.3, serum bicarbonate. 20 mmol/L, and anion g
Název v anglickém jazyce
Fomepizole versus ethanol in the treatment of acute methanol poisoning: Comparison of clinical effectiveness in a mass poisoning outbreak
Popis výsledku anglicky
Context. Mass or cluster methanol poisonings are frequently reported from around the world. The comparative effectiveness of ethanol and fomepizole as antidotes for methanol poisoning is unknown due to the difficulty of performing a randomized controlledtrial. Objective. During an outbreak of mass poisonings in the Czech Republic in 2012-2014, we compared the effects of antidotes on the frequency of health sequelae and mortality. Methods. The study was designed as a cross-sectional case series and quasi-case-control study. Patients with a diagnosis of methanol poisoning on admission to hospitals were identified for the study. Diagnosis was established when (i) a history of recent ingestion of illicit spirits was available and serum methanol was higherthan 6.2 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), or (ii) there was a history/clinical suspicion of methanol poisoning, and serum methanol was above the limit of detection with at least two of the following: pH < 7.3, serum bicarbonate. 20 mmol/L, and anion g
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FE - Ostatní obory vnitřního lékařství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Clinical Toxicology
ISSN
1556-3650
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
53
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
797-806
Kód UT WoS článku
000361070000002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84939599573