EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F16%3A10325196" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/16:10325196 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Context: Management of urinary stones is a major issue for most urologists. Treatment modalities are minimally invasive and include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Technological advances and changing treatment patterns have had an impact on current treatment recommendations, which have clearly shifted towards endourologic procedures. These guidelines describe recent recommendations on treatment indications and the choice of modality for ureteral and renal calculi. Objective: To evaluate the optimal measures for treatment of urinary stone disease. Evidence acquisition: Several databases were searched to identify studies on interventional treatment of urolithiasis, with special attention to the level of evidence. Evidence synthesis: Treatment decisions are made individually according to stone size, location, and (if known) composition, as well as patient preference and local expertise. Treatment recommendations have shifted to endourologic procedures such as URS and PNL, and SWL has lost its place as the first-line modality for many indications despite its proven efficacy. Open and laparoscopic techniques are restricted to limited indications. Best clinical practice standards have been established for all treatments, making all options minimally invasive with low complication rates. Conclusion: Active treatment of urolithiasis is currently a minimally invasive intervention, with preference for endourologic techniques. Patient summary: For active removal of stones from the kidney or ureter, technological advances have made it possible to use less invasive surgical techniques. These interventions are safe and are generally associated with shorter recovery times and less discomfort for the patient.

Název v anglickém jazyce

EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis

Popis výsledku anglicky

Context: Management of urinary stones is a major issue for most urologists. Treatment modalities are minimally invasive and include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Technological advances and changing treatment patterns have had an impact on current treatment recommendations, which have clearly shifted towards endourologic procedures. These guidelines describe recent recommendations on treatment indications and the choice of modality for ureteral and renal calculi. Objective: To evaluate the optimal measures for treatment of urinary stone disease. Evidence acquisition: Several databases were searched to identify studies on interventional treatment of urolithiasis, with special attention to the level of evidence. Evidence synthesis: Treatment decisions are made individually according to stone size, location, and (if known) composition, as well as patient preference and local expertise. Treatment recommendations have shifted to endourologic procedures such as URS and PNL, and SWL has lost its place as the first-line modality for many indications despite its proven efficacy. Open and laparoscopic techniques are restricted to limited indications. Best clinical practice standards have been established for all treatments, making all options minimally invasive with low complication rates. Conclusion: Active treatment of urolithiasis is currently a minimally invasive intervention, with preference for endourologic techniques. Patient summary: For active removal of stones from the kidney or ureter, technological advances have made it possible to use less invasive surgical techniques. These interventions are safe and are generally associated with shorter recovery times and less discomfort for the patient.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Urology

ISSN

0302-2838

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

69

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

475-482

Kód UT WoS článku

000370356100035

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84940860292