Secondary fracture prevention in hip fracture patients requires cooperation from general practitioners

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F17%3A10364283" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/17:10364283 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11120/17:43915166 RIV/00064173:_____/17:N0000097 RIV/00064211:_____/17:W0000022 RIV/00023728:_____/17:N0000083

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0346-z" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0346-z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0346-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11657-017-0346-z</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Secondary fracture prevention in hip fracture patients requires cooperation from general practitioners

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Summary: Despite individual recommendations on osteoporosis management in patients after hip fracture surgery, addressed by orthopedic surgeons to Czech general practitioners, the patients remained undiagnosed and untreated because of provider-level barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention. Purpose: The goal of the study was to assess whether an individual recommendation on osteoporosis treatment addressed to a hip fracture patient&apos;s GP would lead to better osteoporosis management. Methods: Two groups of patients who suffered hip fractures and were treated at the Orthopedic Department were evaluated. In 111 patients, general recommendations on osteoporosis treatment and fracture prevention were provided in a discharge report addressed to the GP. In the second group, 96 patients were provided individually with a detailed written set of recommendations on osteoporosis examination, treatment, and fracture prevention, which was also provided in the discharge report. A questionnaire to assess the provided care was mailed to the patients 5.3 +/- 1.2 months of discharge. Those patients who did not return the questionnaires were contacted by phone. Results: The questionnaires were received from 44% and 49% of patients from the general and detailed recommendation groups, respectively. Along with the phone call, we were able to contact 78 (70.3%) and 68 (70.8%) patients from the general and detailed recommendation groups, respectively. GPs secured osteoporosis evaluation in 14.6% of the patients. Calcium supplementation and vitamin D supplementation were newly provided in 42.7 and 36.4% of the patients, respectively. Anti-resorptive therapy was newly provided in 8.3% of the patients. No significant differences between the groups were observed in osteoporosis evaluation, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and anti-osteoporosis treatments.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Secondary fracture prevention in hip fracture patients requires cooperation from general practitioners

Popis výsledku anglicky

Summary: Despite individual recommendations on osteoporosis management in patients after hip fracture surgery, addressed by orthopedic surgeons to Czech general practitioners, the patients remained undiagnosed and untreated because of provider-level barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention. Purpose: The goal of the study was to assess whether an individual recommendation on osteoporosis treatment addressed to a hip fracture patient&apos;s GP would lead to better osteoporosis management. Methods: Two groups of patients who suffered hip fractures and were treated at the Orthopedic Department were evaluated. In 111 patients, general recommendations on osteoporosis treatment and fracture prevention were provided in a discharge report addressed to the GP. In the second group, 96 patients were provided individually with a detailed written set of recommendations on osteoporosis examination, treatment, and fracture prevention, which was also provided in the discharge report. A questionnaire to assess the provided care was mailed to the patients 5.3 +/- 1.2 months of discharge. Those patients who did not return the questionnaires were contacted by phone. Results: The questionnaires were received from 44% and 49% of patients from the general and detailed recommendation groups, respectively. Along with the phone call, we were able to contact 78 (70.3%) and 68 (70.8%) patients from the general and detailed recommendation groups, respectively. GPs secured osteoporosis evaluation in 14.6% of the patients. Calcium supplementation and vitamin D supplementation were newly provided in 42.7 and 36.4% of the patients, respectively. Anti-resorptive therapy was newly provided in 8.3% of the patients. No significant differences between the groups were observed in osteoporosis evaluation, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and anti-osteoporosis treatments.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30211 - Orthopaedics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Archives of Osteoporosis

ISSN

1862-3522

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

12

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000411041700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85027717653