Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The state of national electronic prescription systems in the EU in 2018 with special consideration given to interoperability issues

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F20%3A10417101" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/20:10417101 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/68407700:21460/20:00341541 RIV/00064165:_____/20:10417101

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=rktkYnrFHV" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=rktkYnrFHV</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104205" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104205</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The state of national electronic prescription systems in the EU in 2018 with special consideration given to interoperability issues

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Introduction: The electronic prescribing system (EPS) is now widely used in the USA and largely also in EU member countries. Nevertheless, comparisons of different EPS are very scarce. Whilst the EU strives for cross-border interoperability in healthcare, the aim of this study is to provide a contemporary account of the state of national EPS in such countries. Methods: For the sake of consistency the state of each of the EPS as of the end of 2018 was researched using an e-mail questionnaire. Respondents were chosen from among authors who have previously published studies on electronic prescriptions. Results: Data on EPS was gathered from 23 out of the 28 EU member states. In 2018 EPS was in daily use in 19 EU states, and one further country had a pilot project, whereas the remaining 3 were only at the planning stage. Most of the EPS do not differ significantly in basic design, however authentication procedures vary substantially. Discussion: There is a significant increase in EPS usage in EU countries as compared with previous studies. Cross-border interoperability in the EU is still limited, and further advancement might be hampered by differences in authentication procedures. Conclusion: Although it was not possible to acquire data from all the EU countries, this study shows the present state of electronic prescription in most of them and demonstrates continuous development in this area.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The state of national electronic prescription systems in the EU in 2018 with special consideration given to interoperability issues

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Introduction: The electronic prescribing system (EPS) is now widely used in the USA and largely also in EU member countries. Nevertheless, comparisons of different EPS are very scarce. Whilst the EU strives for cross-border interoperability in healthcare, the aim of this study is to provide a contemporary account of the state of national EPS in such countries. Methods: For the sake of consistency the state of each of the EPS as of the end of 2018 was researched using an e-mail questionnaire. Respondents were chosen from among authors who have previously published studies on electronic prescriptions. Results: Data on EPS was gathered from 23 out of the 28 EU member states. In 2018 EPS was in daily use in 19 EU states, and one further country had a pilot project, whereas the remaining 3 were only at the planning stage. Most of the EPS do not differ significantly in basic design, however authentication procedures vary substantially. Discussion: There is a significant increase in EPS usage in EU countries as compared with previous studies. Cross-border interoperability in the EU is still limited, and further advancement might be hampered by differences in authentication procedures. Conclusion: Although it was not possible to acquire data from all the EU countries, this study shows the present state of electronic prescription in most of them and demonstrates continuous development in this area.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30502 - Other medical science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    International Journal of Medical Informatics

  • ISSN

    1386-5056

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    141

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    September

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    IE - Irsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    6

  • Strana od-do

    104205

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000579780700030

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85085545690