The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients affected by knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F25%3A10498539" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/25:10498539 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Cal802j-F5" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Cal802j-F5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03061-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s40520-025-03061-0</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients affected by knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) compared to standard of care in improving pain, physical function, and stiffness in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) over six months. Secondary outcomes included multidimensional frailty and quality of life. Design: An exploratory, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Setting: Five European geriatric centres in Italy, Germany, Turkiye and the Czech Republic. Participants: Seventy older adults (mean age 76.1 +- 6.8 years; 80% female) with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 1-2) were randomized into two groups: CGA (n = 35) or standard of care (n = 35). Intervention: The CGA group underwent a multidimensional geriatric assessment and intervention, identifying impairments and tailoring interventions accordingly, while the control group received standard of care. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was improvement in pain, stiffness, and functional limitations measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) over six months. Secondary outcomes included changes in multidimensional frailty (Multidimensional Prognostic Index, MPI), quality of life (SF-36), and adherence to interventions. Results: The CGA group showed a non-significant improvement in total WOMAC scores (-4.49 +- 3.40, p = 0.19), with slight reductions in pain (-1.12 +- 0.96) and functional limitations (-3.26 +- 2.21). MPI slightly improved (-0.02 +- 0.04, p = 0.69), but no significant changes were observed in SF-36 scores. No falls, hospitalizations, or severe adverse events were reported. Conclusions: CGA may offer potential benefits for managing knee OA in older adults, particularly for pain and function, though statistical significance was not achieved. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients affected by knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) compared to standard of care in improving pain, physical function, and stiffness in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) over six months. Secondary outcomes included multidimensional frailty and quality of life. Design: An exploratory, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Setting: Five European geriatric centres in Italy, Germany, Turkiye and the Czech Republic. Participants: Seventy older adults (mean age 76.1 +- 6.8 years; 80% female) with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 1-2) were randomized into two groups: CGA (n = 35) or standard of care (n = 35). Intervention: The CGA group underwent a multidimensional geriatric assessment and intervention, identifying impairments and tailoring interventions accordingly, while the control group received standard of care. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was improvement in pain, stiffness, and functional limitations measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) over six months. Secondary outcomes included changes in multidimensional frailty (Multidimensional Prognostic Index, MPI), quality of life (SF-36), and adherence to interventions. Results: The CGA group showed a non-significant improvement in total WOMAC scores (-4.49 +- 3.40, p = 0.19), with slight reductions in pain (-1.12 +- 0.96) and functional limitations (-3.26 +- 2.21). MPI slightly improved (-0.02 +- 0.04, p = 0.69), but no significant changes were observed in SF-36 scores. No falls, hospitalizations, or severe adverse events were reported. Conclusions: CGA may offer potential benefits for managing knee OA in older adults, particularly for pain and function, though statistical significance was not achieved. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30227 - Geriatrics and gerontology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Aging: Clinical and Experimental Research

ISSN

1594-0667

e-ISSN

1720-8319

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

155

Kód UT WoS článku

001489850700003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105005437182