Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F12%3A00003769" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/12:00003769 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60162694:G44__/12:43874591 RIV/00216224:14110/12:00059081 RIV/00216208:11110/12:11629 RIV/00216208:11150/12:10108062 a 6 dalších
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1772-z" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1772-z</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1772-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00280-011-1772-z</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The current guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Surprisingly, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not listed as an indication for reperfusion therapy. This study analysed patients with AMI presenting with RBBB [with or without left anterior hemiblock (LAH) or left posterior hemiblock (LPH)] and compared them with those presenting with LBBB or with other electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns. The aimwas to describe angiographic patterns and primary angioplasty use in AMI patients with RBBB. Methods and results. A cohort of 6742 patients with AMI admitted to eight participating hospitals was analysed. Baseline clinical characteristics, ECG patterns,coronary angiographic, and echocardiographic data were correlated with the reperfusion therapies used and with in-hospital outcomes. Right bundle branch block was present in 6.3% of AMI patients: 2.8% had RBBB alone, 3.2% had RBBB + LAH,
Název v anglickém jazyce
Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The current guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Surprisingly, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not listed as an indication for reperfusion therapy. This study analysed patients with AMI presenting with RBBB [with or without left anterior hemiblock (LAH) or left posterior hemiblock (LPH)] and compared them with those presenting with LBBB or with other electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns. The aimwas to describe angiographic patterns and primary angioplasty use in AMI patients with RBBB. Methods and results. A cohort of 6742 patients with AMI admitted to eight participating hospitals was analysed. Baseline clinical characteristics, ECG patterns,coronary angiographic, and echocardiographic data were correlated with the reperfusion therapies used and with in-hospital outcomes. Right bundle branch block was present in 6.3% of AMI patients: 2.8% had RBBB alone, 3.2% had RBBB + LAH,
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Heart Journal
ISSN
0195-668X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
33
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
86-95
Kód UT WoS článku
000298891000011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—