An invasive or conservative strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F12%3A43896697" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/12:43896697 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064173:_____/12:43896697

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.059" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.059</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.059" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.059</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

An invasive or conservative strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine an invasive or conservative strategy in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. Background: Diabetic patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome, yet it remains unknown whether they derive enhanced benefit from an invasive strategy. Methods: Randomized trials comparing an invasive versus conservative treatment strategy were identified. The prevalence of cardiovascular events through12 months was reported for each trial, stratified by diabetes mellitus status and randomized treatment strategy. Relative risk (RR) ratios and absolute risk reductions were combined using random-effects models. Conclusions: An early invasive strategy yielded similar RR reductions in overall cardiovascular events in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. However, an invasive strategy appeared to reduce recurrent nonfatal MI to a greater extent in diabetic patients. These data support the upd

Název v anglickém jazyce

An invasive or conservative strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine an invasive or conservative strategy in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. Background: Diabetic patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome, yet it remains unknown whether they derive enhanced benefit from an invasive strategy. Methods: Randomized trials comparing an invasive versus conservative treatment strategy were identified. The prevalence of cardiovascular events through12 months was reported for each trial, stratified by diabetes mellitus status and randomized treatment strategy. Relative risk (RR) ratios and absolute risk reductions were combined using random-effects models. Conclusions: An early invasive strategy yielded similar RR reductions in overall cardiovascular events in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. However, an invasive strategy appeared to reduce recurrent nonfatal MI to a greater extent in diabetic patients. These data support the upd

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

ISSN

0735-1097

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

106-111

Kód UT WoS článku

000306088200004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—