Mathematical modelling for the comparison of plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis stability in intraarticular distal radius fractures

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F14%3A43908108" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/14:43908108 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/68407700:21220/14:00218091 RIV/00216208:11110/14:10195720 RIV/00216208:11130/14:10195720 RIV/00064203:_____/14:10195720

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2014_023" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2014_023</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2014_023" target="_blank" >10.4149/BLL_2014_023</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Mathematical modelling for the comparison of plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis stability in intraarticular distal radius fractures

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: A comparison between plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis techniques in terms of the biomechanical stability of distal radius fracture fixation. Methods: Mathematical modelling was used to simulate distal radius fractures, type C1 and typeC2, and to compare the stability of osteosynthesis in both techniques under several wrist joint load conditions: axial compressive loading of the radius, bending loads in volar and dorsal flexion and radial and ulnar deviation, and axial torsional loading of the forearm. Results: For both type C1 and type C2 fractures, the stability of intramedullary osteosynthesis was comparable with plate osteosynthesis in dorsal flexion. Plate osteosynthesis proved to be more stable only in ulnar deviation. The intramedullary X-screw technique provided more stability when loads were applied in volar flexion, radial deviation, pronation and supination, and in axial loading of the radius. Conclusions: The result of mathematical simulations was compara

Název v anglickém jazyce

Mathematical modelling for the comparison of plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis stability in intraarticular distal radius fractures

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: A comparison between plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis techniques in terms of the biomechanical stability of distal radius fracture fixation. Methods: Mathematical modelling was used to simulate distal radius fractures, type C1 and typeC2, and to compare the stability of osteosynthesis in both techniques under several wrist joint load conditions: axial compressive loading of the radius, bending loads in volar and dorsal flexion and radial and ulnar deviation, and axial torsional loading of the forearm. Results: For both type C1 and type C2 fractures, the stability of intramedullary osteosynthesis was comparable with plate osteosynthesis in dorsal flexion. Plate osteosynthesis proved to be more stable only in ulnar deviation. The intramedullary X-screw technique provided more stability when loads were applied in volar flexion, radial deviation, pronation and supination, and in axial loading of the radius. Conclusions: The result of mathematical simulations was compara

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FI - Traumatologie a ortopedie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Bratislavské lekárske listy

ISSN

0006-9248

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

115

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

107-111

Kód UT WoS článku

000331992300012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—