The EGALITY study: A confirmatory, randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, versus the originator product in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F17%3A43912296" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/17:43912296 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00064173:_____/17:N0000065
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15152" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15152</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15152" target="_blank" >10.1111/bjd.15152</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The EGALITY study: A confirmatory, randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, versus the originator product in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BACKGROUND: GP2015 is a proposed etanercept biosimilar. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and etanercept originator (ETN, Enbrel((R)) ) in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. METHODS: 531 eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice-weekly subcutaneously. Patients with a 50% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 50) at week 12 were re-randomised to continue the same treatment on a once-weekly dosing schedule or to undergo a sequence of 3 treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Thereafter, patients continued treatment with the product they had been assigned to last, up to week 52. RESULTS: The difference in PASI 75 (75% improvement from baseline PASI score) response rates at week 12 between GP2015 and ETN (primary endpoint) was -2.3%. The 95% confidence interval (-9.85, 5.30) was well contained within the pre-specified margin range of (-18, 18). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 52 was comparable between continued GP2015 (59.8%) and ETN (57.3%); switching treatments revealed comparable safety profiles. Anti-drug antibodies, all non-neutralising, were limited to 5 patients on ETN during treatment period 1, and 1 patient in the switched ETN group, who had been treated with GP2015 for 12 weeks at time of the finding. CONCLUSION: The EGALITY study demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and ETN. The study results provided the final clinical confirmation of biosimilarity and contributed to the totality-of-the-evidence proposing that GP2015 is an etanercept biosimilar.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The EGALITY study: A confirmatory, randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, versus the originator product in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis
Popis výsledku anglicky
BACKGROUND: GP2015 is a proposed etanercept biosimilar. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and etanercept originator (ETN, Enbrel((R)) ) in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. METHODS: 531 eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice-weekly subcutaneously. Patients with a 50% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 50) at week 12 were re-randomised to continue the same treatment on a once-weekly dosing schedule or to undergo a sequence of 3 treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Thereafter, patients continued treatment with the product they had been assigned to last, up to week 52. RESULTS: The difference in PASI 75 (75% improvement from baseline PASI score) response rates at week 12 between GP2015 and ETN (primary endpoint) was -2.3%. The 95% confidence interval (-9.85, 5.30) was well contained within the pre-specified margin range of (-18, 18). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 52 was comparable between continued GP2015 (59.8%) and ETN (57.3%); switching treatments revealed comparable safety profiles. Anti-drug antibodies, all non-neutralising, were limited to 5 patients on ETN during treatment period 1, and 1 patient in the switched ETN group, who had been treated with GP2015 for 12 weeks at time of the finding. CONCLUSION: The EGALITY study demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and ETN. The study results provided the final clinical confirmation of biosimilarity and contributed to the totality-of-the-evidence proposing that GP2015 is an etanercept biosimilar.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30216 - Dermatology and venereal diseases
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
British Journal of Dermatology
ISSN
0007-0963
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
176
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
928-938
Kód UT WoS článku
000399363100037
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85014009195