Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F20%3A43918397" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/20:43918397 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.007" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.007</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.007" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.007</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a key area of research. To date, whether MS type and the rehabilitation setting are associated with worse or better response to rehabilitation is unclear. We aimed to understand the association between balance and MS type, in/outpatient treatment and specificity of the intervention. METHODS: We assessed 150 people with MS before and after in/outpatient rehabilitation. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to discriminate between responders (&gt;=+3-point improvement in BBS score; a clinically meaningful improvement) and non-responders to specific or non-specific balance rehabilitation. Factors associated with balance were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Balance improved after rehabilitation: median (quartile 1 [Q1]-Q3) BBS score pre- and post-rehabilitation of 49 (45-53) and 52 (47-55) (P&lt;0.001). Univariate logistic analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in balance associated with pMS (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09-4.05]), inpatient therapy (0.41 [0.19-0.84]), using a walking aid (1.68 [1.06-2.69]), and low baseline BBS score (0.86 [0.81-0.92]). On multivariable analysis, probability of improvement was similar for participants with pMS and the relapsing-remitting form but was associated with low baseline BBS score and specific treatment (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.89] and 5.66 [1.79-21.5]). CONCLUSION: A clinically meaningful improvement in balance was more likely when MS individuals with moderate to high disability had specific exercises targeting balance, but MS type did not influence the outcome.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial

Popis výsledku anglicky

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a key area of research. To date, whether MS type and the rehabilitation setting are associated with worse or better response to rehabilitation is unclear. We aimed to understand the association between balance and MS type, in/outpatient treatment and specificity of the intervention. METHODS: We assessed 150 people with MS before and after in/outpatient rehabilitation. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to discriminate between responders (&gt;=+3-point improvement in BBS score; a clinically meaningful improvement) and non-responders to specific or non-specific balance rehabilitation. Factors associated with balance were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Balance improved after rehabilitation: median (quartile 1 [Q1]-Q3) BBS score pre- and post-rehabilitation of 49 (45-53) and 52 (47-55) (P&lt;0.001). Univariate logistic analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in balance associated with pMS (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09-4.05]), inpatient therapy (0.41 [0.19-0.84]), using a walking aid (1.68 [1.06-2.69]), and low baseline BBS score (0.86 [0.81-0.92]). On multivariable analysis, probability of improvement was similar for participants with pMS and the relapsing-remitting form but was associated with low baseline BBS score and specific treatment (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.89] and 5.66 [1.79-21.5]). CONCLUSION: A clinically meaningful improvement in balance was more likely when MS individuals with moderate to high disability had specific exercises targeting balance, but MS type did not influence the outcome.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30210 - Clinical neurology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

ISSN

1877-0657

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

63

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

FR - Francouzská republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

93-98

Kód UT WoS článku

000525738200002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85080854369